Support verbdowntown

Park Fifth Public Benefits Approved, but TFAR Process Raises Questions

By Eric Richardson
Published: Thursday, April 24, 2008, at 01:52PM

Park 5th Model Dave Bullock [Flickr]

A model of the Park Fifth project, whose public benefits package was approved by the CRA Board on Friday.

Friday morning the board of the Community Redevelopment Agency approved the Public Benefits package for the Park Fifth project, a $17.7 million package that includes money for Pershing Square redevelopment, streetscape improvements, and $2.5 million each to the Downtown Women’s Center and Skid Row Housing Trust.

While the room on Friday was filled with speakers in support of the project, several questions were raised as to how the recipients of this funding were chosen.

The Park Fifth project is able to be built to the density that it is because of the TFAR (Transfer of Floor Area Ratio) ordinance, which the city passed last year. That ordinance allows unused permitted floor area for under-built city sites to be sold to developers who wish to build larger projects than the zoning of their site would normally allow.

There are two payments associated with the TFAR process: the Public Benefit Payment and the TFAR Transfer Payment. The TFAR ordinance sets formulas for how much each is to be.

The money that the city collects from TFAR sales is intended to be used “for public purposes.” Specifically, the ordinance defines those as:

… providing for affordable housing, public open space, historic preservation, recreational, cultural, community and public facilities, job training and outreach programs, affordable child care, streetscape improvements, public arts programs, homeless services programs, or public transportation

improvements.

While some funds are allowed to be directed to specific uses, an important function of the ordinance is to fund the “Public Benefit Payment Trust Fund.” The ordinance specifies that at least 50% of the Public Benefit Payment must go into the Fund unless Council gives a special exemption, and that 100% of the Transfer Payment goes into the Trust Fund.

And yet both of the two projects to use the new TFAR ordinance – Park Fifth and 1133 S. Hope – have come through the process with all of their funds specifically targeted and with no money getting added to the Trust Fund.

The CRA report for 1133 S. Hope says:

Under the TFAR Ordinance, the Developer has the option of paying the entire Public Benefit Payment into the Public Benefit Payment Trust Fund or paying half into the Fund and expending the other half on Community Benefits… Here the Developer is making a cash contribution of $992,298 to Skid Row Housing Trust for the provision of housing for homeless

individuals.

… Under the TFAR Ordinance, the TFAR Transfer Payment is paid in cash by Developer to the Public Benefit Trust Fund. In this case, however, the Developer shall make a cash contribution of $250,005 for the TFAR Transfer Payment to Skid Row Housing Trust for the provision of housing for homeless individuals.

To restate, “the law says this, but in this case we’re doing something else.”

The Park Fifth project’s benefits package includes a $14,210,000 Public Benefit Payment and a $3.5 million Transfer Payment. Of the Public Benefit Payment, $2.5 million is direct to the Downtown Women’s Center, $2.5 million is direct to Skid Row Housing Trust, and $5.4 million goes directly to Recreation and Parks for Pershing Square improvements. No money goes into the trust fund.

The $3.7 million Transfer Payment is required to go into the Trust Fund, and does so, but comes with immediate plans for its use.

The Developer will make a $3,464,440 Transfer Payment to the Public Benefit Trust Fund and requests that the Public Benefits Trust Fund Committee designate the funds for the improvement of Pershing Square Park.

While certainly it is appropriate for developers to have a say in how their money is used – and everyone Downtown is in favor of park redevelopment – the process as it is currently being deployed is dangerous. A significant portion of TFAR funds need to go into the Trust Fund, and they need to be available for an open and fair application process. The best ideas in public benefit will come from competition and not from political designation.

The Park Fifth benefits package must still go through Council approval.



This story belongs to the following topics:

Topic:
Park Fifth

7 stories



Comments

1
Urban Bruin writes:

With Park 5th contributing approximately $8.8 million towards the redevelopment of Pershing Square we are still $17 million short of having a “Bean” of our own. Without more funding it doesn’t look like Pershing Square will get much of a makeover.

“The Bean,” ultimately cost $23 million all by itself. Gehry’s snaking pedestrian bridge, which is as much sculptural public-art piece as walkway, cost $14.5 million.”

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/arts/la-et-civic21apr21,1,5076428.story

# on Apr.24.2008 AT 02:47 PM
2
LAofAnaheim writes:

Park Fifth is giving $14 M for Red Line access improvements. That’s good enough public benefit for me to consider TFAR being used wisely. Not to mention, some cash for Pershing Square.

# on Apr.24.2008 AT 03:58 PM
3
Eric Richardson writes:

LAofAnaheim: Their total public benefit payment is $14 million. They’re getting $2.3 million in credit for the Red Line work, so I would assume the amount they’ll be putting in is roughly similar.

# on Apr.24.2008 AT 04:03 PM
4
Shawn writes:

As long as the council approves it I don’t see a problem. We can see how the money is being spent. So far the LA City Council has been fairly inept at distributing other monies that have gone into other pots and sometimes the money ends up getting spent on non-intended uses.

# on Apr.24.2008 AT 09:38 PM
5
Lauren writes:

As long as this thing gets built. Projects like Park Fifth, 717 Olypmic, LA Live, etc. force people to acknowledge Downtown and gives it some credability. We need projects like this to bring families to downtown and with the two new highschools being built downtown progress will come.

# on Apr.24.2008 AT 11:23 PM
6
tornadoes28 writes:

Downtown will never reach its full potential and truly be a place for families until the massive homeless concentration is eliminated.

Yes, DT has improved over the years. But the fact is I am still seeing on a fairly regular bassis, public urination, agressive panhandling, and homeless begging while at the same time downing a beer.

I would never want to raise my little child in that hell environment.

# on Apr.25.2008 AT 01:31 PM
7
Russell Brown writes:

Unfortunately little of this was a public process. I have little concern about the allocations, except for the lack of transparency on the selection of the affordable housing component. Seems that the way to get CRA approval, is through the ransom payments to Skid Row Housing Trust. These 2 TFAR transactions can also be added to the “voluntary” Astani contribution.

What about projects that other providers have that lack funding? Seems there is no insiders steering it there way.

Also, given the Park & Rec Dept. great record on Quimby expenditures and creative (or lack thereof) park acquisitions, at lease we know where the park funds are going. Now let’s make sure we get a better design and lots of green, from the new improved design Pershing Square.

PS. Remember that none of these funds appear until building permits are pulled. Also all of this does go for City Council review.

Russ

# on Apr.25.2008 AT 08:50 PM
8
Benedict writes:

Wow. Who would have thought that funds getting allocated to an organization that provides housing and services to the homeless would get characterized with the term “ransom.” As tonadeoes28 points out, the homeless issue remains one of DT’s greatest challenges … so why the negativity to someone that’s actually making a difference? I say put all the money into providing housing and services to the homeless … that’s the best longterm solution to DT’s problems - and will ultimatley raise everyone’s housing values.

# on Apr.27.2008 AT 02:39 PM
9
Bert Green writes:

The concentration of homeless downtown is a deliberate policy on the part of LA County over the past 30 years, and cannot be solved by a few small gestures on the part of developers. The containment policy must be reversed. There are some signs that this has begun to happen, and Skid Row has greatly improved in the past few years, but there is a long way to go.

# on Apr.27.2008 AT 08:18 PM
10
Urk writes:

LA is doomed. And it’s all because of people like you.

# on May.09.2008 AT 08:06 AM

Add Your Comment:

YOUR INFORMATION:
Name:
Email:
URL:
CONNECT:

Use your Facebook account to log in to blogdowntown and get share comments and stories straight to your social network!

Don't use Facebook but want us to remember your information? Create a blogdowntown account or log in to your account.


COMMENT GUIDELINES:
Keep it civil, everyone. If you're attacking people instead of arguments, or being overly profane, expect your comment to get deleted.
Comments should be on the topic of the post or they will be removed.
Use the live preview below to see how your comment will look before posting.

COMMENT:
FORMATTING BASICS:

blogdowntown uses Markdown formatting.

_Italics_
__Bold__
<http://url.to.link>
[link text](http://url)

PREVIEW:

Start typing...