Parked Transformer Asks: Do We Really Need that Lane for Traffic?

By Eric Richardson
Published: Tuesday, May 06, 2008, at 11:51PM
Temporary Power Eric Richardson

LADWP generator parked on 6th street, between Broadway and Spring.

For several weeks a generator transformer has been sitting in the northbound curb lane on 6th street with cables feeding down a small drain hole into the utility vault below. That lane is supposed to be for traffic during peak hours, but has been blocked during the duration of the transformer's well-protected stay on the street.

If the city's content to let the lane sit blocked for weeks at a time, one has to question whether it's really so necessary for traffic after all.

This particular lane closure comes thanks to a DWP generator wired into the utility vault underneath. A construction worker on a utility down the block speculated that the unit was wired in to replace a failed transformer below, and that it would be in place until DWP got around to installing a permanent replacement.

Regardless of the reason for the closure, if a "necessary" peak hour traffic lane can be out of service for nearly a month without calamity ensuing, can it really be all that important?

Downtown is littered with streets that provide parking most of the day but turn into throughways during peak hours. DOT engineers would tell you that traffic counts require the greater number of lanes. They would tell you that if the parking were left in during peak hours, disastrous congestion would occur.

And yet the lane's been closed, and people still seem to get where they're going without much trouble.

Perhaps it's time more lanes got "accidentally" taken out of service, and Downtown's planning got a little less focused on raw traffic capacity.


Comments

1
Tony V writes:

It's a transformer. Email Joseph Ramallo at DWP for more info.

Joseph.Ramallo@LADWP.com

# on May.07.2008 AT 03:19 AM
2
Eric Richardson writes:

Doh. I knew that, too. I just totally spaced on my power infrastructure pieces.

# on May.07.2008 AT 09:39 AM
3
tornadoes28 writes:

Hey, that was a pretty good observation. I am surprised the Downtown News did not write this story. You should write for the DT News.

I agree that several streets DT do not seem to need all the lanes, even during "peak rush". Additional parking or even better, a wider sidewalk would be better.

# on May.07.2008 AT 10:52 AM
4
Benjamin Pezzillo writes:

Actually Eric, I have to disagree on the lack of calimity caused by this equipment.

Last week, a film production shut two lanes on this block, in addition to the lane with the equipment. With passage reduced to one lane eastbound traffic backed up to the 110 off-ramp at Figueroa.

A two-minute trip at 4p became a 15-20 minute trip. Unacceptable under any circumstances -- let alone on a stretch of crosstown with the vast amount of bus traffic (including the large articulated buses) that Sixth Street gets.

The transformer is needed, the film production company (Criminal Minds) not abiding by its permit's requirements to keep two lanes open to traffic was not.

# on May.07.2008 AT 01:14 PM
5
Eric Richardson writes:

Ben: I think you're making my point. One lane out for the transformer -- street moves fine. Three lanes out is a different story.

# on May.07.2008 AT 01:22 PM
6
Ben writes:

What I neglected to also state was that without the film crew, as a daily traveler and observer on this route during evening rush hour, the traffic has backed up to between Hill and Olive whereas before that wasn't the case -- so I don't agree there is not an impact from the obstruction due to this equipment.

# on May.07.2008 AT 01:28 PM
7
Terry Roberts writes:

Downtown is rife with similar examples. Do we really need FIVE lanes of traffic on Spring Street during "rush" hour? That's one more lane than the 10 freeway has. The traffic and parking restrictions designed for suburban neighborhoods just don't work for us, yet the city applies them anyway.

# on May.08.2008 AT 02:09 PM
8
Metro Local writes:

Terry: The answer is yes, those lanes need to be open during rush hour. Downtown serves as the region's largest mass transit hub 24/7. Not only do the approximate 500,000 people who work Downtown during the day move through these streets at rush hour but so do tens of thousands (perhaps hundreds even) more who use Downtown to connect to their commute's mass transit transfers. If you did not have these lanes open during rush hour you would see more congestion due to the large amount of buses that would back up the flow of traffic because curb lanes were not open.

# on May.08.2008 AT 10:19 PM
9
tornadoes28 writes:

It's to bad the idiotic urban planners back in the 60's decided to emphasize cars in downtown and the idiotic elevated lanes and ramps for example 4th street through Bunker Hill from the 110.

It would have been such a nicer urban downtown if all the streets such as 4th and Grand actually intersected rather then going under and over each other. Grand was already at a higher elevation then the rest of DT so it was mronic to raise it even further above the surrounding streets. Oh well. Anything that can be done to improve the streets as they are no such as eliminating uneeded lanes is a good thing.

# on May.09.2008 AT 09:52 AM

Your Comment:

YOUR INFORMATION:
Name:
Email:
URL:
  • Comments should be on the topic of the post or they will be removed.
  • Use the live preview below to see how your comment will look before posting.
  • Keep it civil, everyone. If you're attacking people instead of arguments, or being overly profane, expect your comment to get deleted.

FORMATTING BASICS:

blogdowntown uses Markdown formatting.

_Italics_
__Bold__
<http://url.to.link>
[link text](http://url)

COMMENT:

Preview

Start typing...