blogdowntown
Not currently logged in. [Login or Create an Account]

Stay Connected



 

City Staff Recommends Cable-Stay Replacement for 6th Street Bridge

By Eric Richardson
Published: Thursday, February 12, 2009, at 11:52PM
6th Street Viaduct Model Eric Richardson []

This model of the proposed cable-stay design for 6th street was constructed by Caltrans.

A replacement design for the ailing 6th Street Viaduct should have "wow factor," City Engineer Gary Moore told a packed Boyle Heights room Thursday evening. The 1933 structure suffers from a condition called Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR). Described as "cancer," ASR combines with moisture to crumble concrete from the inside.

For the past two years, studies and community meetings have been done to determine whether the existing bridge can be saved, and what should replace it if a new span must be built. When the project's draft Environmental Impact Report comes out in upcoming weeks, it will include a recommendation by city staff that the bridge be replaced with structure featuring a modern cable-stay design.

The community meeting, held at the Boyle Heights Technology Center just across the Los Angeles River on 4th street, was at times heated. One Boyle Heights woman was particularly forceful in her displeasure, repeatedly interrupting the presentation to accuse the project team of pushing its own predetermined agenda and ignoring the community.

The project team's choice of a cable-stay design to replace the historic bridge was the night's main point of contention. Several vocal members of the audience pointed out that the project's Community Advisory Committee had cast the most votes for a design featuring metal arches similar to the existing structure.

Moore defended the team's choice. "We had to make a decision. I'm very excited about the decision," Moore said, calling the project the "new signature of Boyle Heights."

Engineer Steve Thoman explained that a recreation of the existing bridge style would face significant challenges. The 1933 viaduct crosses railroad tracks on both sides of the river. Once the existing bridge columns were removed, the railroad would have to give its permission for new supports to be installed. Thoman said that the team has had meetings with the Union Pacific, and the railroad has no interest in seeing that happen.

Without the columns across the tracks, Thoman said that a recreation would look fake and out of proportion. "It's like a baseball player," he told the crowd. "If he wears a football helmet he can still go up to bat, but it looks funny."

The new design faces significant constraints. Below run the river and railroad tracks, and above cross high voltage power lines that are part of DWP's transmission network.

Along with a new design, the rebuilt bridge would widen the roadway while not adding lanes, creating new space for bicycles and pedestrians. It would also turn 6th street's existing kink into a gentle curve, eliminating the span's prime spot for accidents. That change would require the acquisition of properties along the new right-of-way, and several attendees at the meeting were property owners whose parcels would be purchased. The project team has done interviews with forty business owners along the new alignment.

The project team hopes to have a Record of Decision on the project recorded later this year. That would kick off two years of right-of-way acquisition and engineering work, followed by four years of construction. 6th street would be out of service from 2012 to 2016.

SHARE:

||

Related Stories:


Conversation

Guest 1

Carrie Jacobs on February 13, 2009, at 09:43AM – #1

It will be sad to see the historical bridge replaced with something "modern". Part of downtown's charm, or what is left of it, are the brick buildings and historical architecture. If the 6th Street bridge is replaced with this "modern" blah design, it will not fit in with the community or complement the 7th bridge which still remains a historical/art deco design. I think a modern design is a huge mistake! I have a view every morning of the beautiful 6th Street bridge and I will be very sad to see it go!


Guest 2

Tornadoes28 on February 13, 2009, at 10:37AM – #2

Too bad they can't fast track this project to be able to take advantage of the current Federal stimulus money. If a bridge like the one that fell down in Minnesota can be designed and built within one year, why can't projects like this be also fast tracked in order to get stimulus money.


Guest 3

Don Garza on February 13, 2009, at 01:34PM – #3

I agree with tornado. Let's get that stimulus money and fast track something. Why should it take 4 years to construct a bridge in Los Angeles? With all of the nice weather here, it shouldn't take long. Something is seriously wrong with a 4 year time frame.


Eric Richardson () on February 13, 2009, at 01:51PM – #4

Note that the four years is both demolition and construction, so it is a pretty complicated project.


Guest 4

M a r c on February 13, 2009, at 05:27PM – #5

When I first moved to Boyle Heights, I made sure I walked across each of the bridges at least once. I began to see them in a contextual way, rather than individually.

But if I understand correctly the modernist design choice is based on structural and design challenges that stem primarily from Union Pacific's denial of giving access for the proper placement and construction of the bridge's posts.

This is phucking bullchit.

The bridge should be as close to the original/current design as possible both because of its unique architectural and historical nature but also as it complements the bridges on either side of it.

One industry/organization being able to alter an important recreation project is like I said before (but now in a new way): bucking fullchit.

Is there anything we as citizens and consumers can do to change Union Pacific's position?


Guest 5

John Crandell on February 13, 2009, at 05:46PM – #6

A modern "blah" design would be a mistake equal to attempting to immitate the present, historical "blah" design. As always, the irritation of preservationists is that they always consider anything aged to be untouchable. Blah!

L.A. with it's image of being the city of the future ought to pursue a hyper-modern, expressive design such as one which Santiago Calatrava would/could produce. We need something with flare equal to symbolize our/this time as the Brooklyn Bridge was for it's own time.

Have these proposed alternatives been conceived in-house? They look like it, unfortunately.


Guest 6

Tim Quinn on February 13, 2009, at 06:02PM – #7

The design isn't so blah. You need to look at the picture of the current bridge and mentally overlay the cable-stay portion over the steel arches. The triangle formed by the cables is longer and taller than the steel arches. It will form a landmark visible for miles.

This is a case of bad marketing more than bad design.


on February 13, 2009, at 07:03PM – #8

I was waiting for the pitch for Santiago Calatrava to come. The beauty of the bridges of the Los Angeles River is a style that blends together. Frankly, Los Angeles has been the city of the future for so long, that design strategy is boring and blah.


Guest 5

John Crandell on February 13, 2009, at 11:55PM – #9

Well let's just consider the early 90s expansion of the Central Library. Surely it is of a design which supposedly blends so well with Goodhue's original masterpiece and that is the problem at hand. What could Sterling, Foster, Piano, Gehry or even Jahn have accomplished instead, that would be so much finer to use and experience? Instead we are now stuck with that dispiriting, leaden, oppressive descent into banality. And the cause of it all was our glorious preservation movement. They are incapable of imagination. And I've not ever dealt with professional types no less unctious, persnickety, no less snotty and nostrils forever and a day flared to the max. Good that they prevent particular demolitions, but that is all.


Guest 7

ubrayj02 on February 18, 2009, at 10:33AM – #10

John Crandell,

Ugh, I can only imagine the steaming pile of glass shards and steel belted crap those celebrity architects would bring to the central library. Bleah.

The only thing those guys are concerned with is stroking their own egos and collecting fat checks. We, the public, have to live with their crap for generations. Better to borrow from the classics and focus on human-scale issues and the minutia therein. It makes for a better building in the long run.

Your whining above reads like a pouty brat upset that mommy and daddy won't buy an ice cream cone WITH UNICORN DUST ON TOP! Waaaah!


Guest 8

Juanito on February 18, 2009, at 07:41PM – #11

You swallow your own hoisted petard, U-dude. Your words remind me of suburbanoid reactionaries, how they reacted to Gehry's design for Disney Hall. Zeus only knows what would have made them happy.


Guest 9

JCA on February 18, 2009, at 08:30PM – #12

Replacing beautiful historic bridge with a modern boring one is a tragedy hopefully Mr. Huizar will step in and insist on something better.

This is about as boring and generic as it can get. They might as well leave the one up they have now and just cut the traffic off of it so people can just walk on it and at least we'd have something beautiful and historic. And didn't the city make the bridges all historic landmarks and if so isn't there an obligation to do something at least sort of historic styled to fit into context?


Guest 10

Purple Haze on February 19, 2009, at 09:17PM – #13

Ourossoff's NYT review of the new Tully Concert Hall at Lincoln Center says it all in regards to preservation.

Sixth Street Bridge/Viaduct is the only structure which spans a majority of the floodplain. It needs to be relied upon in the event of a major flood or earthquake. Replace the whole thing with a vote for the future, not the past. Symbolize!



Add Your Voice


In an effort to prevent spam, blogdowntown commenting requires that Javascript be enabled. Please check your browser settings and try again.

 


blogdowntown Photo Pool

Photos of Downtown contributed by readers like you.

Downtown Blogs


Downtown Sites


Elsewhere