Cultural Heritage Commission Sets Hearing to Weigh In On 6th Street Viaduct

By Eric Richardson
Published: Tuesday, July 28, 2009, at 10:18AM

Bridge_night.jpg Ed Fuentes [Flickr]

A nighttime rendering of the "3-Dual Tower Cable Supported Viaduct" design was presented in April as a possible replacement for the 6th Street Bridge.

On Thursday morning the city's Cultural Heritage Commission will hear a presentation of the project to replace the crumbling but historic 6th Street Viaduct.

After hearing from Bureau of Engineering staff and project consultants, the body will hear public comments and then finalize its comment letter on the project.

The commission weighs in on the project because the bridge is Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument 905, but it was only given that designation in January of 2008, a year after the first meetings on a potential replacement took place.

In a proposed letter available on the Planning website as a PDF, the body criticizes a lack of options that would retain the historic designation and preserve part or all of the original structure.

The 6th Street bridge is one of a dozen historic structures to cross the Los Angeles river as it passes through Downtown, suffers from a condition called Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR). Described as "cancer," ASR combines with moisture to crumble concrete from the inside.

As part of the current project, the City has commissioned a wide range of experts to assess whether the current bridge could be saved, but reports continue to say that retrofit options would only slow the damage and would destroy much of the look of the structure.

The project recently issued its Draft Environmental Impact Report. All comments received during the Draft EIR stage must be responded to in the final EIR document.

The Cultural Heritage Commission meeting will take place on Thursday, July 30, at 10am in City Hall Room 350.

SHARE:

Tweet This Story || Share on Facebook


Comments

1
Richard Figueroa writes:

How much time is there between now and when the bridge is unsafe?

# on Jul.28.2009 AT 11:56 AM
2
Eric Richardson writes:

I don't believe there's any definite point. It just grows increasingly more likely to someday fall down.

# on Jul.28.2009 AT 12:38 PM
3
David writes:

It's something like a 75% chance to fall down within in the next 100 years, which bascially means it is quickly getting to the point that if it is not replaced, it needs to be closed.

# on Jul.28.2009 AT 01:48 PM
4
JDRCRASH writes:

The Big One is most certainly going to occur within the next 100 years(if not 50), so that should be even more incentive to replace it.

# on Jul.28.2009 AT 01:57 PM

Add Your Comment:

YOUR INFORMATION:
Name:
Email:
URL:
CONNECT:

Use your Facebook account to log in to blogdowntown and get share comments and stories straight to your social network!

Don't use Facebook but want us to remember your information? Create a blogdowntown account or log in to your account.


COMMENT GUIDELINES:
Keep it civil, everyone. If you're attacking people instead of arguments, or being overly profane, expect your comment to get deleted.
Comments should be on the topic of the post or they will be removed.
Use the live preview below to see how your comment will look before posting.

COMMENT:
FORMATTING BASICS:

blogdowntown uses Markdown formatting.

_Italics_
__Bold__
<http://url.to.link>
[link text](http://url)

PREVIEW:

Start typing...