Around the Halls: September 21 - 23
Ed Fuentes
DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES — Today is Monday, September 21, and Council is back on a regular schedule after having worked through a recess last week. Filming talk gets a spotlight in committee on Tuesday, while El Pueblo leases get a mention in a pair of meetings.
MONDAY: Public Safety and Budget & Finance committees are scheduled to meet.
Public Safety considers two graffiti items continued from July. CF 09-0297 would require stores to lock up hydrofluoric acid and not sell it to minors, while CF 09-0630 would do the same for spray cans. The City Attorney's response: We already have laws against both.
Budget and Finance goes into closed session to discuss a handful of lawsuits, but then returns to talk about the state of the budget. El Pueblo lease negotiations get an update in item 12, though not a Council File number.
TUESDAY: Council's in session, as are four committees.
El Pueblo's also a topic at Arts, Parks, Health and Aging, where CF 09-2254 asks for a report on eviction procedures and past rent disputes.
At the Jobs and Business Development committee, Jack Kyser, Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation; Paul Audley, Executive Director of FilmLA; Jim Sharp, Executive Director, Fox LA; Ed Duffy, Teamsters Local 399; David Phelps, Director of External Relations, Association of Independent Commercial Producers (AICP); and John Kosinski, Writers Guild of America West (WGAw) will all speak on filming issues. The item is listed as a discussion item, not a file number.
The committee will also hear a report on CF 08-1783, addressing runaway production.
At Planning and Land Use Management, rules for marijuana dispensaries again come up for debate in CF 08-0923. This is an item that's been continued multiple times.
WEDNESDAY: Council and Transportation committee are the only two posted agendas.
At Council, item 15 is CF 09-1850, Historic Cultural Monument designation for the Douglas Building at 257 S. Spring.
At Transportation committee is CF 09-1384, an item continued from a delayed meeting two weeks ago. DOT reports on its attempts to get major venues to pay for the costs of traffic officers deployed for events.















No comments yet. Care to start things off?