9th & Hill Park Backers Solicit Lobbying, Say Fountain will Cost Extra
This rendering of the proposed park at 9th & Hill does not show the final design, which includes a hill and playground area.
DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES — At a well-attended update meeting that included a short speech by Councilman Jose Huizar, the community group working to put a park at 9th and Hill encouraged stakeholders to lobby their elected officials and said that a desired fountain will require private fundraising.
The design presented last night includes a grassy hill, plenty of trees, playground equipment, a fountain and an area focused on dogs.
Huizar's office and the city's Department of Recreation and Parks teamed up with community stakeholders to submit a $5 million application for Prop 84 park funds. Approximately 1,000 applications were submitted statewide for the $184 million first round of funding.
It is unclear what effect any lobbying could have on that application. Applications are scored using a rubric that combines demographic and park density statistics with the project attributes. The projects will be ranked and funded based on that scoring.
Where lobbying could come into play is the project's ability to secure additional funds. The $5 million Prop 84 grant would combine with $1.6 million in local funds to allow a base design to be built, but upgraded components would require more money. Project backers see private fundraising playing an important role there, but also intend to pursue other government funding sources.
One piece not included in the $6.6 base design is the fountain, intended to be placed near the center of the park site. Recreation and Parks estimates that it would cost an additional $300,000 to $500,000, but private estimates would likely place that lower.















Susana Benavidez on March 26, 2010, at 11:02AM – #1
foundation or fountain? Do you have more pictures of the design and of the meeting itself? Thanks!
Eric Richardson (@blogdowntown) on March 26, 2010, at 12:25PM – #2
Oops. Fountain! I'll fix that.
Robert on March 26, 2010, at 03:14PM – #3
I would love to see the fountain in the first phase. Hopefully we can find a benefactor to donate the money for a fountain. Let's see...one developer could sell one loft in their project and pay for it. Or how about a memorial fountain? Lot's of possibilites. I would love to see a smaller version of the Mulholland fountain near Griffith Park. Something classic.
http://www.you-are-here.com/location/mulholland.html
Karin Liljegren on March 26, 2010, at 03:36PM – #4
Just curious - how come Quimby Fees that go to Park n' Rec can't be used on this project?
Eric Richardson (@blogdowntown) on March 26, 2010, at 06:24PM – #5
Karin: Quimby would be part of the $1.6 million in local money. The park sits in Councilman Huizar's district, and that district actually has very little in Quimby funds. Most went to CD9, Jan Perry's district. They're only ever supposed to be spent inside the district where they are generated, but in this case CD9 is contributing some funds as well.
Whitman Lam on March 27, 2010, at 11:15AM – #6
That price tag sounds very expensive. Do they have contractor bids on these projects or is it all done by Parks and Recreation ?
Downtown Cowboy on March 27, 2010, at 01:08PM – #7
Very glad a park is going in. However, I do hope it will be fenced and locked at night. Otherwise it will be a campground and a toilet.
Eric Richardson (@blogdowntown) on March 27, 2010, at 02:25PM – #8
Whitman: A big chunk of the price tag is the cost of the land, which has been on the market for $8 million.