blogdowntown
Not currently logged in. [Login or Create an Account]

Stay Connected



 

6th Street's Fate Delayed by Environmental Review

By Eric Richardson
Published: Wednesday, August 25, 2010, at 04:45PM
Sixth Street Viaduct Eric Richardson

The 1933 6th Street Viaduct, viewed from the 4th street bridge in a 2007 photo.

The 6th Street Viaduct has cancer, but the path to get it into treatment has not exactly been a smooth one.

The project’s Environmental Impact Report was supposed to be released this summer, but on Tuesday city staff emailed members of the Community Advisory Committee to let them know that further review by Caltrans would result in a delay of approximately six months.

That would place the release of the document four years from the project’s public kickoff. Built in 1933, the structure is considered to be the gem of the collection of historic spans that cross the Los Angeles River as it cuts through Downtown. It stretches 3,500 feet, from Matteo Street to Boyle Avenue in Boyle Heights.

Despite its status as a Historic Cultural Monument, the city’s project staff feels that the viaduct must be torn down due to a condition known as Alkali-Silica Reaction, or ASR. A combination of high alkali content and certain reactive elements in the aggregate cause the concrete to crumble from the inside, steadily reducing the chances that the structure would survive a major earthquake.

The viaduct is the only one of the spans to suffer from ASR. It was built using an on-site concrete plant specially constructed for the job, and the local materials led to the toxic mixture.

If the viaduct must be torn down, opinion has been split on how to replace it. Some want a re-creation of the historic structure, while project staff have pushed for a more modern design.

SHARE:

||

Related Stories:


Conversation

Guest 1

Guest on August 26, 2010, at 10:06AM – #1

HISTORIC!!!! come on people, save some of the history that makes downtown uniquel, and add to it's original character! HISTORICAL RECREATION ALL THE WAY!


User_32

crystal on August 26, 2010, at 11:01AM – #2

I love all the historic bridges crossing the river. i think it should be rebuilt as a replica. a modern bridge is not going to fit in with the rest of the bridges and area.


User_32

David McBane on August 26, 2010, at 12:11PM – #3

One big problem with doing the historical recreation is replacing two of the supports for the bridge. If you look at the picture above - there are three supports, one in the middle of the river and two on either side of the river, right next to the railroad tracks. The supports next to the railroads only have an easement that allows them to be there (instead of being the property of the City) and if they are torn down, which they must because they suffer from ASR, the easement automatically ends. The railroad company won't grant a new easement so a 100% historic recreation is impossible at this point.


Guest 2

Guest on August 26, 2010, at 07:03PM – #4

OK, looking at the cable-stay version that looks to be the front-running design, the proposed support piers are on the far sides of the RR right-of-way. Idea: instead of a completely-to-scale design, why not recreate the spirit of the design with the new placement of piers, but now metal arches that are even taller and more dramatic? No clue on cost, but those would then soar REALLY high!



Add Your Voice


In an effort to prevent spam, blogdowntown commenting requires that Javascript be enabled. Please check your browser settings and try again.

 


blogdowntown Photo Pool

Photos of Downtown contributed by readers like you.

Downtown Blogs


Downtown Sites


Elsewhere