blogdowntown
Not currently logged in. [Login or Create an Account]

Stay Connected



 

Target Says New Store Will Fit Downtown

By Eric Richardson
Published: Thursday, November 04, 2010, at 11:34AM
Target Lease Signing Eric Richardson []

Target's Carmen Moch and Brookfield Properties' Bert Dezzutti shake hands after their lease signing as Councilwoman Jan Perry and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa applaud.

When Target opens its new store at 7+Fig in late 2012, the location will represent the company's new approach to urban retailing.

"More than ever, we're recognizing that one size does not fit all," said Carmen Moch, group vice president at Target, at a Thursday morning press conference and lease signing attended by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Councilwoman Jan Perry.

That means creating a store that works for Downtown both in terms of design and in the products carried. "The assortment will be tailored to the urbanite," Moch explained. "We recognize that our guests aren't going to be walking out with patio furniture."

The 104,000-square-foot store that was officially announced on Wednesday has been a long time coming for Downtown. The deal is the central city's largest retail lease since the 7+Fig complex signed Bullock's and Robinson's department stores before opening in 1986.

"This commitment to Downtown Los Angeles is a commitment, I think, that acknowledges and recognizes that you're seeing a transformation here in Downtown," Villaraigosa said.

"I think that we can now claim that Downtown is the bustling city center that it deserves to be," said Perry. "We had been missing this key component, and that component is the retail."

The store will occupy the middle level of the 7+Fig complex, taking space that formerly was split between the two department stores. It will also have an entrance on the complex's lowest level, which is connected to the 1,600-space parking garage.

Ralphs' 2007 return to Downtown was a major milestone for the neighborhood, and was cited several times during the morning press conference. The new Target will give the grocer its first major competition.

"We will have soft lines, which are the clothing and the home goods, but we will also have food," Moch said.

The company expects the customers to have different shopping patterns than those who visit its traditional stores. The store's planning will acknowledge that most shoppers will be arriving on foot, Moch said, and will be designed around multiple small trips rather than single, large visits.

The 330,000-square-foot 7+Fig complex has been saddled with growing vacancy since the 1990's. Bullock's closed in 1997 and the former Robinson's, by then a Macy's, shuttered in early 2009.

While it was no real secret that owner Brookfield Properties was in talks with Target to come into the space, the dragged-out deal left some in Downtown wondering if it would ever really happen.

According to Bert Dezzutti, senior vice president with Brookfield's Southern California office, the delay was unavoidable.

"This is the first step of the repositioning of the center," said Bert Dezzutti, senior vice president with Brookfield's Southern California office. "There's a lot that goes on with that, and we wanted to do it right. Downtown deserves a project that is well thought-through, that contemplates everything that Target needs and the community needs."

"[We] would have loved to open a store earlier, but that's just not the reality."

Plans for the overall renovation of the complex will be announced "very soon," Dezzutti said. "Target is a tremendous anchor and a brand that other great brands want to be around."

The company has high hopes for the complex, which is located across the street from the 7th & Metro subway station, one of the two busiest stations in the growing Metro rail system.

"An important element of what will make this Target store and this center successful for years to come is that it is at the center of the transit hub in Downtown Los Angeles," Dezzutti said. "The way people shop and live their lives is changing so dramatically Downtown that [this deal] couldn't have come at a better time."

Brookfield owns approximately 3.7 million square feet of commercial office space in Downtown, spread between 7+Fig, the 725 S. Figueroa office tower, the 601 S. Figueroa tower and Bank of America Plaza.

That last complex could be the next to see a significant development.

"There may be some announcements, but we're really premature on that," Dezzutti said. "Our focus right now is on maximizing the asset that we have at 7th and Figueroa Street, and this is going to be the beginning of that process."

SHARE:

||

Related Stories:


Conversation

Guest 1

Guest on November 04, 2010, at 02:00PM – #1

"There may be some announcements, but we're really premature on that" Do i smell a Trader Joe's?


Guest 2

Guest on November 04, 2010, at 02:25PM – #2

I know this Trader Joe's cashier who donated to anti-gay causes, so I can't support Trader Joe's. Don't get me started.


Will N Michelle on November 04, 2010, at 02:26PM – #3

So looking forward to this opening! @ guest1 A Trader Joe's would also be amazing!


Guest 1

Guest on November 04, 2010, at 03:36PM – #4

@ Guest #2

Wait so I'm going to have to get you started....you avoid a company because of an employees personal beliefs? It's not like Trader Joe's is running around promoting anti-gay sentiments. That would be a whole other story.


Guest 2

Guest on November 04, 2010, at 04:36PM – #5

Yes. We have to vote with our wallets!


Guest 3

Guest on November 04, 2010, at 05:05PM – #6

When Target Corporation decided to put down $150,000 to support a Republican candidate for governor in Minnesota, the company really dug itself into a hole. Why? Because that candidate, Tom Emmer, is well known for taking positions that make him one of the most anti-gay political candidates in the country.

On his Web site, Tom Emmer makes it clear. "I believe marriage is the union between one man and one woman. As a legislator, I have consistently supported the constitutional marriage amendment that protects traditional marriage," Emmer says.

But what Emmer doesn't say on his Web site is that as a state legislator in Minnesota, he also worked hard to try and restrict surrogacy to husband and wife couples only. During debate on a bill that discussed contractual arrangements for surrogate mothers, Emmer inserted an amendment that would have prevented gay and lesbian couples, as well as unmarried heterosexual couples, from using a surrogate mother.

The amendment was defeated. But Emmer's position on LGBT families couldn't have been made more clearly. He underscored his support for keeping gay and lesbian couples from using surrogate mothers by saying, "The whole purpose behind this legislation is people, husbands and wives who are not able to conceive children."

Tom Emmer: against gay marriage, against gays and lesbians parenting children, and friends with a Christian ministry that has advocated violent and discriminatory actions against the LGBT community. He's also Target's candidate of choice for Governor.


User_32

derblut on November 04, 2010, at 06:37PM – #7

This is downtown blog not your own political forum, people. These comments should really be removed. Looking forward to our new Target.


Guest 4

Guest on November 04, 2010, at 07:35PM – #8

I love downtown. I love Target. Happy. Peace. Rainbows 4 ever!!!


Guest 5

Guest on November 04, 2010, at 08:11PM – #9

Target is lame. Don't need it, don't want it.


Guest 6

Guest on November 04, 2010, at 10:22PM – #10

It's kind of quaint that downtown Los Angeles has been so desperate for so many years that the arrival of a Target is treated like big news.

People in certain other cities (NYC, Chi, SF) must look at such a reaction and stifle a desire to snicker. They probably think it's not too different from folks in a small town saying "hurrah, we've finally gotten our first traffic signal!! We iz in da big leagues now!"

But, yes, Target's pending arrival is good news, but long overdue. The community is like a 40-year-old who's finally learning how to ride a bike. Next goal: learning how to drive a car.

As for "GLBT," should the "B" be allowed to have both a husband and wife? Why not? The more the merrier.


Don Garza on November 04, 2010, at 11:22PM – #11

Distressing news about Target... I had no idea..

On another note , I hear this target will not sell food items. This my friends , if true , is the distressing part of the whole business. We need the full spectrum of services when these box retailers move in.

I have known that property for a long time and now that they are Brookfield I know them now. They do great work! They work with The Midnight Misson in skid row, not just donating money , but they donate their time. I assume they may even partner with those organizations to help place people in jobs! (You hearing me over there guys!)They have marketing people who are open to the whole community of Downtown. The most wonderful people in the world. Please remember this.

Congratulations to Brookfield Properties on their partnership with Target.

And to another poster : I agree, Trader Joes or whole foods! What is the deal!? When I win the Lottery rest assured I will be bringing whole foods and Trader Joes or whatever organic market's the peeps of Downtown want...gotta go headed to Ralph's.


Don Garza on November 04, 2010, at 11:25PM – #12

Missed the updated story , they will carry food!


Guest 7

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 01:34AM – #13

Tom Emmer seems to have lost the governor's race in MN- Target's contribution was not enough to defeat the Democrat. I have made my feelings known to Target by writing to the CEO and PR and I am ready to give them another chance. I understand that the Shareholders made it clear to them that they did not feel comfortable with the backlash and corrective measures will be put in place. So, welcome Target - we will be watching you closely.


User_32

bill on November 05, 2010, at 07:40AM – #14

What troubles me most about the Target funding Emmer controversy is they refused to do anything about it. After they were caught with their pants down, Target just shrugged their shoulders and said "oh well" - "it's about business - we don't care if he advocates for the eradication of gays as long as he reduces our tax base". Human Rights Campaign worked with them for two weeks to get them to mitigate what they had done by giving a like amount to a gay charity and they refused. So, while I'm hoping the public pressure on this issues has precluded them from future funding of fiercely anti-gay candidates, there seems to be no conscience on their part for the damage they have done.


Scott Mercer on November 05, 2010, at 09:08AM – #15

If you didn't shop anywhere where the corporation owning the place did not agree with your political views, you'd be hard pressed to shop anywhere. Businesses have one goal: make money, hopefully a profit. Politics is merely secondary to that goal. (That's why all these business moguls trying to enter politics claiming they will govern in the same way that they ran a business are a bad idea...government does not work the same way a business does.)

Unfortunate that Target chose to donate money to an idiot, but boycotting Target won't create change. If you are really upset, write a carefully composed, well thought out letter to one of the higher-ups in the organization, stating why you believe they made a mistake. Emphasize you are a customer, or at least a potential customer. That will have a lot more impact than grinding your teeth and buying your mouthwash somewhere else.


Guest 3

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 09:22AM – #16

You are wrong, Scott Mercer. Money talks. That's why Coors stopped its anti-gay funding. You can shop at Target if you want. Good luck sleeping at night.


Guest 8

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 09:37AM – #17

Who cares where Target or any large business invests there money? As long as they offer a wide variety of products and low prices, I'm good with that. It benefits ME and YOU, the consumers.

Get off your political horses and live a little. Don't be so one sided! All you will ever be is offended by every other thing and every other person with a mentality like that.


User_32

Downtown Cowboy on November 05, 2010, at 09:44AM – #18

Scott - well composed reply, but I have to disagree. I too was sickened by the Target corporate support of a hate monger and did write a well composed, thoughtful letter to the CEO, the Chairman of the Board, and their public relations department. Of course there was no response. The only way to get soulless corporations to listen is to affect them fiscally. There's a huge, and growing, Boycott Target movement. There are several Facebook pages dedicated to it, as well as the effort headed by the Human Rights Campaign. Target can ignore the damage they have done, but eventually, there will be a financial impact. I live in and LOVE downtown Los Angeles. I am a rabid fan of anything that improves life in the area. However, I will not be giving my money to a corporation that will then turn around and use it to funds actions diametrically opposed to my well being. We will be seeing many locally owned businesses open up. I will be shopping there and not in Target.


Guest 9

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 11:17AM – #19

Target has a long history of supporting the LGBT community in Minneapolis and beyond. In fact, Target received a perfect score from the Human Rights Campaign because of the company's work with the LGBT community. Target has spent significantly more on support of the LGBT community than the $150k mentioned.

Target has clearly recognized that they made a mistake. The original donation went to a pro economic growth organization which chose to allocate the funds to the Emmer campaign. Target will be much more careful in the future in understanding the impact of where their campaign donations are allocated. I don't think this will happen again.

Making a donation to a pro-GLBT organization immediately after this incident would have been a dangerous move. Target would have set a precedent for any organization to demand money that didn't agree with how Target contributes to campaigns or even in the community.

Give Target a chance!


User_32

Downtown Cowboy on November 05, 2010, at 11:55AM – #20

I'm happy to give Target a chance. I would love for them to act responsibly and address the situation in a positive manner. The problem I have is that they have done NOTHING to mitigate the damage they have done. I don't buy the "we didn't realize what we were doing" argument they are using. They knew exactly what they were doing, they just didn't expect to get caught. HRC worked with them for two weeks to come up with an acceptable plan of action and Target refused to do anything. HRC has removed their rating of Target. It would be very easy for Target to make a gesture of support for the huge gay community downtown and that would alleviate the animosity towards them. Let's see if they're that smart.


Guest 10

Guest on November 06, 2010, at 08:16AM – #21

A lot of people are hoping ultimately for a Trader Joes Downtown...including me. Currently I take the Red Line to Hollywood and Vine to shop at the new Trader Joes there. It seems extremely quiet in there. I know TJs would be packed all the time if they came Downtown. They should have arrived Downtown first. The Ralph's is packed all the time...and the employees there are rude. They could learn a lot from Trader Joes about customer service. I hope Target does a better job in screening applicants.


User_32

J-M on November 06, 2010, at 11:02AM – #22

Maybe you should wait for them to actually build the Target Downtown in two years before boycotting it? In the meantime, if you want to prove a point, why don't you target (pun intended) existing stores?


Guest 11

Guest on November 07, 2010, at 02:00AM – #23

Yeah, those Ralphs folks have an unofficial slowdown happening. They creep.


Brigham Yen on November 09, 2010, at 01:41AM – #24

Most companies have done something VERY WRONG. Did you know that Kimberly Clark (maker of Kleenex) was cutting down mature boreal forests in Canada so we could blow our noses? That is beyond wrong no matter how you look at it.

Target has two years to redeem themselves before gays start boycotting. And I hope they do because I see Target coming into downtown as a huge sign that things are definitely changing. Soon, we will hopefully have more retail shops open and start attracting shoppers from across the region to shop in Downtown LA instead of the myriad malls around the suburbs.


Guest 3

Guest on November 10, 2010, at 05:35PM – #25

Well, Brigham Yen, many of we gays are already boycotting Target. However, you're right: things could change in two years and maybe then we'll be able to join you in buying cheap Tide and third-world made Target brand underwear.

By the way, did you see that the right wing candidate Target funded is calling for a recount? The count is close partly because of Target's donation. Shame!


User_32

John Adlai () on November 11, 2010, at 01:21PM – #26

I'm planning on move to the center, if only we could get more advertising agencies to move back to central city, like TBWA or McCann we can get a more interesting work mix instead of lawyers and financial d-bags.



Add Your Voice


In an effort to prevent spam, blogdowntown commenting requires that Javascript be enabled. Please check your browser settings and try again.

 


blogdowntown Photo Pool

Photos of Downtown contributed by readers like you.

Downtown Blogs


Downtown Sites


Elsewhere