blogdowntown
Not currently logged in. [Login or Create an Account]

Stay Connected



 

Shepard Fairey Mural Marked in Arts District

By Ed Fuentes
Published: Thursday, December 16, 2010, at 10:19PM
Arts District Defacement Scot Ezzell

Shepard Fairey's “Peace Goddess” mural, seen here, was defaced Wednesday morning by two artists represented by the nearby R&R Gallery.



The Arts District community quickly responded early Wednesday morning after three men were seen scrambling from the roof of Wurstküche after defacing a Shepard Fairey wheat-paste work. By noon the next day, the process to restore it was well underway.

The symbols tagged on Fairey’s “Peace Goddess” piece resemble those on a separate wheat-paste poster on Zip Fusion across the street near east 3rd and Traction, promoting an upcoming show at R & R Gallery. Similar marks were also seen on graffiti walls across the alley from the gallery.

Jeremy Williams of District Millworks located across the street from the mural, recognized the marks as being from R & R Gallery’s current show. He told blogdowntown that he went to the gallery and confronted two artists who at first denied involvement in the tagging before admitting responsibility.

Los Angeles River Artists and Business Association (LARABA) and LADADspace board member Jonathan Jerald tells blogdowntown he followed up by calling the gallery the next day and spoke with owner C.W. Mihlenberger, who said his gallery represented the two artists. Mihlenberger defended their actions and said they’d defaced the mural because, "it was getting old." The mural was installed in November, 2009.

According to Jerald, after an exchange of calls from him, and pressure from neighborhood advocates, Mihlenberger has agreed to pay for the repair of the Shepard Fairey mural.

Reached for comment, a spokeperson for Fairey said, “Shepard does not think that charges should be pressed against them as long as they are willing to pay for the damage and apologize to [building owner] Mr. [Paul] Solomon.” Solomon has been a long time advocate for art to be placed on his Arts District buildings.

R&R Gallery did not return multiple calls made by blogdowntown for comment on Thursday.

While those behind the markings defend their acts as a critique of overexposure, Arts District locals are calling it vandalism. Daniel Lahoda, who organizes street art placement through L.A. Freewalls Project says, “Shepard Fairey is often a target for those wanting to get their names known.”

Lahoda is responsible for bringing the Fairey installation, an unpaid commission, to the Arts District where it overlooks Joel Bloom Square.

Lahoda, who doubles as a street art curator, now says the wall art should be restored by the end of the week. “Fairey will hand paint the damaged panels this afternoon and the piece will be back in place by the end of the week,” he said.

Murals are from a part of the art world that can lead to unusual politics and the Arts District is seen a safe haven. Fairey’s Hope poster series began appearing in the surrounding blocks months before becoming an icon for new political art (and later the subject of its own controversy).

The action of the unnamed artists may also demonstrate the mixed messages of the street art creed of what is censorship, what is vandalism, and what is expression on buildings.

While Shepard's piece and street art in general is recurring topic around the neighborhood, another LARABA and LADADspace board member, Tim Keating, was at Wurstküche catching up on events of the day before heading toward Winterfest's installation. “It’s the crackling of anarchy,” he said with bemusement.

SHARE:

||

Related Stories:


Conversation

User_32

DavidAC on December 17, 2010, at 08:16AM – #1

It's so hard to create things but so very easy to destroy them...

:-(


Guest 1

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 09:38AM – #2

I'd like to think that Ed Fuentes is back in town but alas, he did not do the photos for this story (except one from the files).


Jonathan Jerald on December 17, 2010, at 10:02AM – #3

The cowards associated with R and R who trashed the mural claim they were engaging in a well established form of public dialog. Unfortunately, they don't know much about the ethics of true wheat-paste artists, who would never deface a mural that is clearly in a curated space and not on a street level wall, where a lively visual dialog creates a constantly changing collage of ideas and images. New work is generally respected, at least for a week or so, and major curated work is never tagged by true artists -- only amateur wannabes looking for cheap publicity. How can they tell the difference between the space where a dialog is encouraged and curated space? The curated pieces are forty feet or so off the ground, accessible only by trespassing (they had to put a ladder on a dumpster and cross a rooftop to reach the base of the piece and use a roller on a extended pole). Just across the street on Traction there are several walls where the wheat paste changes constantly. Even the dullest art school drop-out would have noted that the street level art changes constantly while the huge wheat paste (a very expensive piece to produce)has remained untouched for the year it's been in place. It is disingenuous in the extreme for the inexperienced art students affiliated with R and R to claim they were engaged in anything other than a shameless attempt to promote themselves. Now, having failed to think through the consequences of smearing black paint on a carefully constructed work, they want to avoid the attention they craved and refuse to even reveal their names. Cowards. But maybe they are wise to seek a low profile. They also tagged the murals on the building bounded by Third, Garey, Second and the alley between Third and Second. Even the most adventurous taggers know to leave those walls alone. I suspect R and R will soon discover what sort of 'dialog' they have unleashed upon themselves....


User_32

westondeboer on December 17, 2010, at 10:10AM – #4

LAPD’s Art Theft Detail has received numerous citizen complaints alleging thefts and unfair business practices by Daniel John Lahoda, 33, who buys and sells art under the business names of JetSet Graffiti and Lahoda Fine Arts, LLC. He is not wanted by the police at this time.

Lahoda has used the internet to find buyers for art. The complaints include allegations of art ordered and paid for but never delivered. It also includes taking art on consignment and diverting the art and money obtained for his own use. There have been allegations of false advertising, unfair business practices, selling unauthorized prints, and exorbitant delays in shipping art to purchasers.

Between , Lahoda worked for Equator Gallery in the

Boston area. Lahoda was terminated when the owner, artist Sasha Raiz, noticed the gallery was losing money and discovered that Lahoda was embezzling funds and diverting business and art to his home address.

Lahoda then moved to Las Vegas and worked for S2 Art Group. After a year, he was fired when the owners learned he was embezzling funds and sleeping on the job.

Lahoda next got a job with Acumen Entertainment Group in Las Vegas. According to the police report, Lahoda was fired for embezzling more than $47,000 in cash, art and merchandise from the company. Lahoda then moved to Los Angeles.

If you are aware of similar incidents involving Daniel Lahoda, please contact LAPD’s Art Theft Detail at

or by e-mail at


Chris Loos on December 17, 2010, at 10:41AM – #5

I don't see this as a huge deal. Its not like its the only only one; Shepare Fairey does carbon copies of this mural all over the country. There's one near my old place in Wash DC, in an alley off P Street.


Guest 2

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 10:42AM – #6

It's completely pathetic for these jerk-offs to claim they're doing anything other than defacing other artists work for the purposes of their own self-promotion. Screw them and the R&R.


User_32

on December 17, 2010, at 10:55AM – #7

So putting crude Xs, bars, and blocks across another person's commissioned and placed-by-owner's-request artwork on a private building is "a critique of overexposure" and not vandalism? Hmmm, no, not getting that. Especially if you deny your involvement when confronted.

So the art world has its cowards, too. Nice.


Teri Hendrich on December 17, 2010, at 10:58AM – #8

Vandalism of street art? We've come into a new age when we no longer consider them one and the same - which I'm thankful for.


Guest 3

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 11:24AM – #9

It doesn't surprise me that it was another artist. The so called "art communty" is nothing more then a group of immature, pompous parasites. 90% of art is crap, that keeps art critics employed, superficial actors mesmerized and the nouveau riche a sense that they've arrived.


Guest 4

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 12:06PM – #10

Defacement, pure and simple, and criminal for that matter. BTW,this very wall was the location of my architectural practice's sign for nearly ten years.


Guest 5

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 12:49PM – #11

The R & R has an opening tonight and I'm sure they'd support anyone who wants to alter the works in the show in the spirit of creating a public dialogue. Bring your own spray paint.


Guest 6

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 01:07PM – #12

Craven vandalism that is akin to book-burning.


Guest 7

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 01:33PM – #13

I'm not sure if this has anything to do with it, but Fairey's reputation as a street artist worth respecting is in serious decline after his copyright-suit Obama poster debacle:

http://techcrunch.com/2009/10/16/ap-claims-shepard-fairey-admits-to-lying-and-trying-to-destroy-evidence-his-counsel-quits/

Street art is anarchic by nature. It's not surprising to me that someone would target a Fairey piece, and I'm not sure it's worth caring about, except as a curiosity.


Daveed Kapoor on December 17, 2010, at 01:37PM – #14

its because Shepard has become blind http://www.iexpo2010.com/shepard-fairey-scurries-to-protect-his-dealercurator.html

censorship of BLU mural is wrong.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2010/12/anonymous-street-artist-puts-up-mural-condemning-jeffrey-deitch.html


Anthony Costantino on December 17, 2010, at 01:37PM – #15

Guest 3 hits a lot of spots with that comment, I tend to agree with a lot of it. Not only is the art world so subjective, but for this Mihlenberger guy to defend the actions is pretty silly. Maybe they should go throw some acid around the Getty next time they see something they don't like, since they are the arbiters of what is "old."


Guest 3

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 01:54PM – #16

Be careful Hitler was a frustrated artist and we all know what happened with him!!!


Guest 8

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 01:55PM – #17

I think it's an indication of a civilized society to respect art even if it's not our cup of tea. (I was going to say - that we don't go around peeing to mark our territory, but given the condition of DT's sidewalks, that's not a good analogy.) repeat: "So the art world has its cowards, too. Nice."


Guest 9

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 02:04PM – #18

Way to go R&R. All these horrible Shepard Fairey graphics all over town are an eyesore. I think it's funny what they did.


Guest 10

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 02:08PM – #19

Controversy keeps the art world interesting.


Guest 5

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 03:52PM – #20

This isn't just about Fairey. They painted over other people's work also. He just happens to be the most recognizable.


Guest 11

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 06:24PM – #21

Stepford Harry makes non art. If someone wisely eradicates poopy pap, then he/she should be congratulated. Call it curation by the populace who are not willing to lick Stepford's very popular a-hole.


Guest 12

Guest on December 17, 2010, at 07:36PM – #22

Looks like it was turned into a Julian Schnabel painting like his "Girl With No Eyes"


Bryan Harris on December 17, 2010, at 11:03PM – #23

I'm glad someone tagged over that fucking thing. I was really sick of looking at it. I moved out of the neighborhood recently after being a resident for 6 years, but all those walls get boring if no one attacks the existing and turns it into something new every once in a while. Shepard's pie was growing some mold.


on December 18, 2010, at 03:06AM – #24

They should have used green paint.


Guest 13

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 09:06AM – #25

Brian, that is one of the most ignorant statements i've ever heard.


Guest 14

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 09:28AM – #26

Can't help but wonder if the gallery and gallery associations woulda been the first people called had I been caught up there committing that act. I can see the blogdowntown headline now describing how SWAT got me down. Imagine a witness calling you directly repeatedly convincing you to pay for it? Its craziness. I wonder if other taggers are allowed to claim they're mere critics when they get sentenced. Where's the investigative reporting here? TELL US THEIR NAMES! When local people and businesses are having a hard time, closing down, getting evicted, you give us the skinny. When people look certain ways we get a photo and their name....why not put these hipsters on blast as well?


Jonathan Jerald on December 18, 2010, at 10:37AM – #27

A Vandal Responds:

Here's the response of one of the guys who defaced the mural (C.W. Mihlberger of TheRandR.org), received via email yesterday:

Jesus. Are you really this bored? Aren't you living in the 'arts district' aren't you too busy creating something or anything to be bothered with this bullshit? Shouldn't you be busy pushing the limits of what art is and can be? You guys use the actual anarchist logo for your flyers and promotion of the 'arts district' but as seen now you spend all your time slapping the hands of other artists (which you absolutely must not be) to prove some point that art should never tampered with? Is the idea of creation not pushed by pushing each other? Isn't the idea of creating 'art' or 'ideas' to actually have fun and push an idea further from something you've seen or done or something you've seen someone else do? My entire idea in life of creating 'art' is to have a blast doing it. To hopefully have fun in shitty life while actually creating something someone may notice and care about. OR notice and hate. But as long as someone notices and there is an effect I will always be ok with that. Positive or negative. And what I'm doing in life has, and always will have more of an effect on people than your bitching about what was fair or not fair in the 'super liberal anything goes anarchist arts district' you all wear that anarchist logo with such great pride. I'm sorry you don't agree with what we did. Not a single human over 50 would agree with it. Because you have no idea what art is turning into. Just like I will never understand what art will turn into with the generation behind me. That doesn't make you shitty. It just means it will always be moving past what you would imagine. You Jonathan have lost touch with imagination. And I feel sorry for you. What a bummer you aren't out pushing creativity. I'm guessing you've just given up. There isn't any other reason you would actually give a fuck about any of this if you were still creating and pushing the limits. But instead you're just wasting a shitload of peoples time with a waste of time. Without actually creating anything yourself. So can you please relax and remember how fun it is to actually create and fuck up and have fun with the idea of actually creating art? Art isn't about control. And that's all you're after. To CONTROL the 'arts district' as your own. If this was actually a full blown 'arts district' we absolutely wouldn't be having this bullshit conversation. We had a great show tonight with some art that you or I could never created. Not because we aren't capable, but because we all do something different. But you missed it because you are too busy defending someone else's art rather than your own. And that's a damn shame. You don't live and exist in the oh so amazing 'arts district' because you're a true artist. You live and exist here because you might not be capable of changing shit with your art so you have to stay busy trying to control it. Your voice is of an older generation. One I don't understand. Just like you don't understand mine. And just like I won't understand the one coming up under me. So fucking stop and try to have fun and create. Because that's what the whole fucking idea of art is. To have fun! And create something. Anything. Not sit and bitch and moan about what someone else has done or created. No matter how different it is than what you would have done. That's boring as fuck. And pathetic. So please stop. If you hate what I am doing, not WE. This isn't R&R speaking. Then come fucking talk to ME about it. Or create something better and bigger than what I'm doing. Just stop bitching. You're only conclusion as an 'artist' is to call the police, Shepard Fairey, or other crews that 'won't be as sympathetic as shepard'? Pretty lame. But, what the fuck do I know? I'm just some wanna-be drop out coward failed artist that has no idea what I'm talking about. And you're a bored old dude. So why don't we actually drop all this bullshit and have a blast creating art? I'll do it my dumb ass way you don't agree with and you do the same. And I promise you I will NEVER EVER give a shit about what you do enough to ever waste your time with 20 emails or phone calls. Because Im sure you're busy as hell with your art or whatever you're doing in life. Just like me. Or maybe not. My fingers are tired. And I have tons of actually important shit to do.

Here's my response to that:

Really? You're the injured party? Did you really NOT think you would piss people off by defacing a popular community icon?

Your jab about how the over 50 crowd is not capable of grasping the profound, creative insights implicit in your crude vandalism reminds me that in my day (which I guess is now long past) it was anyone over thirty that couldn't be trusted to get it. Oh well. I guess over fifty is the new over thirty and I guess there is some small consolation in the knowledge that there is a least a fair chance that someday you will yourself be over 50 and whatever insights you once possessed as a youth will be long forgotten.

I like what you guys do in your space. I was as much dismayed and disappointed as angered by what you did, which is essentially a slap in the face of the community. You can't possibly believe that there would be no consequences to your casual, destructive act. Are you honestly that naive? Why are you so surprised at the reaction?

If you think it's just old farts like me who object, why not ask a few of your cohorts to see what they think? Check with Yo Peace, whose mural of Jeffrey Deitch dressed as a mullah whitewashing Blu's MOCA mural of coffin and dollars went up at Traction and Third yesterday morning -- or ask Eddie Cottta, Mark of the Beast or ABCNT -- the latter three 20 something artists featured in the Winterfest show we curated for the community directly across the street from the mural you defaced.

Actually, though, I agree this is boring. I'd much rather read more about the reaction to Jeffrey Deitch's censorship of Blu. Imagine, one asshole taking it upon himself to paint over an artist's mural on a public wall! What a jerk!


on December 18, 2010, at 01:16PM – #28

At least he can be commended for putting as much thoughtful consideration into his writing as his painting.


Guest 2

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 01:27PM – #29

Re: the vandal's reponse: No one over 50 agrees with what they did? More like no one over the age of 5 could have written such an idiotic, rambling defense of their so-called artist mission to have fun. getting called out for what they did obviously got under their skin. losers.


Guest 15

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 03:10PM – #30

Community icon? That OBEY piece is up everywhere. Its practically like street art wallpaper. Street art is fair game. Someone will always tag over your shit if it is LAME.


Guest 16

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 04:46PM – #31

I read this article trying to keep an open mind, hoping to understand why CW and other nameless artists from R&R would stand behind such an act. I found that CW is as inapt at explaining his 'creativity' as he is at expressing it.

I will admit that it must have taken a lot of time and planning to climb up a building in the middle of the night and masterfully paint out thick black X's across that mural. He must have learned that through all his years of experience. But wait... he's a self proclaimed "wanna-be drop out coward failed artist that has no idea what I'm talking about." But he did have a "fucking blast doing it," and “as long as someone notices and there is an effect I will always be ok with that. Positive or negative.” Then success to you CW.

Saying that anyone over 50 doesn’t understand his expression is a cop out. I'm not even close to 50 and I still think the action and explanation is lacking. "It was fun...the painting was lame...and people have lost their imagination" all sound like excuses my 8 year old would give me if I caught her painting on my walls. But she actually knows better than that unlike CW and the R&R group.

Next time you want to express yourself and 'fix' someone else's own expression of art, here is an idea...make it more interesting to look at than what was up there before. Crazy thought I know. And do it in broad daylight, be proud of it and don’t run and hide until you are forced to admit your lack of judgment. Hope it was worth it, since I imagine it will be pricey for you to pay to fix.

There are a lot of things in our community that need people to stand up for...like child abuse, hunger, domestic violence, homeless people and animals to name a few, but it is great that you are putting your money, mouth and time behind defacing art and then writing rambling, nonsense excuses to how stupid everyone else is because they just don’t get it. And nor do you give a fuck... I know, we get it.

Enough rambling for me...I have a ton of "actually important shit to do." I'm off to tear down all my neighbors Christmas decorations and spray paint all the baby Jesus’ with big black X's. They've always bugged me anyway. Peace and goodwill to all my ass.


Guest 17

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 06:00PM – #32

CW failed miserably in attempting to defend his criminal actions by defacing art on someone elses property.


Guest 18

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 06:36PM – #33

The most uncool thing ever is to explain your art.

Word to the young 'uns.


Guest 1

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 06:38PM – #34

"Not a single human over 50 would agree with it."

Actually, Mihlberger, I'm 60 and I sorta liked it. What really sucks is your ageist, bullshit attitude. You're younger so you're better? Dude, you suck shit through a rag. Fuck you.


Guest 19

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 07:45PM – #35

CW, I've seen the "art" in your gallery. It was...lacking. Sure, art should be fun to make, but dude, what about skill?

Since the arts district is so apparently lame and disappointing for you, I look forward to your speedy departure.


Guest 19

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 07:50PM – #36

CW.

You go on and on about being creative, yet you do so in defense of a destructive act.

I'm not sure you even know the difference between "create" and "destroy."


Guest 19

Guest on December 18, 2010, at 08:12PM – #37

Wow. This R and R guy sounds like an ignorant, spoiled, little shit.


David Markland on December 18, 2010, at 10:53PM – #38

I think another issue here may be that CW is ignoring that besides being an artist, who could possibly justify the actions, he's also an Arts District neighbor/business owner. There are simply certain sacrifices and compromises one needs to make when you own a business or want to be part of a community. The question is whether defacing neighboring building in the name of art (and to promote a show) is okay.


User_32

bigphatcatlover on December 19, 2010, at 12:46AM – #39

I don't agree with or condone the vandalism of art, but in this particular "artist's" case (SF) it's karma in action. SF literally steals other people's art and sells it as his own and now someone (right or wrong) obliterates his "art" - yep, that's karma. R&R Guys: Watch out - karma works on everyone.


Guest 1

Guest on December 19, 2010, at 10:35AM – #40

Yes, I can hardly wait to visit the R&R Gallery. I have a calling card I plan to leave behind.


Guest 20

Guest on December 19, 2010, at 06:23PM – #41

David Markland nailed it!!


Guest 21

Guest on December 19, 2010, at 08:33PM – #42

Jonathan Jerald: Your use of the phrase "true artist" disqualifies all post herein. Get of SF's nutsack.

Chris Loos: Word.

Guest 3: Word!

Jasmijn: True dat. But the bldg owners could have just bought SF t-shirts instead of trying to give their biz "street cred".

Guest 6: See last sentence of first comment.

Bryan Harris: Ha! Passion... I love it.

Guest 15: Really tho... So true.

bigphatcatlover: Right. On.

For the "Vandal": You're bored so yall painted black X's? Lame. A clearly painted price tag attached to that stupid redundant mural would have been far more effective. But your young, you'll learn.


Guest 22

Guest on December 20, 2010, at 12:48AM – #43

I wish the people responsible for the vandalism were arrested.

I would hope they would be sentenced to many hours cleaning up graffiti in the city.

I don't see that happening. I hope R&R gets tagged so much that their building owner considers them a nuisance and will not renew their lease.

As a long time Arts District resident, I will not support a business that negatively affects my community. Myself and my neighbors liked that piece of art as it was. Also, I know people who live in that building and they were not happy with the vandalism. I don't believe the building's owner would be happy with the vandalism either (especially since the square symbol was on his grey building, not the SF mural and now he'll have to get that painted over).


User_32

David Klappholz on December 20, 2010, at 07:39AM – #44

I rarely post negative comments here, but: This "discussion" has been the most childish and inane that I've seen on any topic.


User_32

on December 20, 2010, at 08:41AM – #45

Dear "Artist":

This is not street art. This is a mural placed on private property at the behest of the of the owner of the building. Not the same thing. I don't give two bat farts if you think this mural is "old" or "stale" or you have some kind of hate-rage against Shepherd Fairey because he makes tons of money off his art theft and you make no money off your art theft.

What you did is vandalism, and any lawyer would tell you that. If SF had put this up on some public telephone pole with no permission and you defaced it, then, fine, that's fair(ey) game.

The fact that you can't tell the difference between the two situations in context reveals how self-centered and myopic you truly are. Not that self-centered and myopic artists are exactly RARE, but that doesn't mean that I have to like it.


Guest 4

Guest on December 20, 2010, at 09:01AM – #46

Now that the vandal/defacer has clearly identified himself, I think he should be brought to justice in a quite public way. What is the right punishment for this crime? A fine that covers the cost of repair? Perhaps, but I think more is in order. If we are going to jail taggers, then equal treatment demands the same for this jerk. What specifically is the penalty we can leave to a judge, but I do believe this case should go through the process.


Guest 23

Guest on December 20, 2010, at 11:24PM – #47

The attack was retaliation for Fairey sticking up for Deitch when he painted over Blu's mural at MOCA. Plain and simple.

http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/01/deitchs_last_show_shepard_fair.html

Word from inside MOCA is that Deitch asked Fairey to stick up for him in the Times. This is not rocket science.


Guest 23

Guest on December 20, 2010, at 11:50PM – #48

No one complains when an ad for The Gap is defaced.

What's the difference?


Guest 2

Guest on December 21, 2010, at 09:32AM – #49

@#47 are you serious? that is the single stupidest comment i've ever read on blogdowntown, and there's been some real competition. 'word from inside MOCA'...let me guess, your contact was code-named named deep throat and he tipped you off in a parking garage at midnight. as long as you're at it, can you ask your source if deitch had jfk killed over the blu mural? not rocket science, indeed.


User_32

DavidAC on December 21, 2010, at 11:23AM – #50

I think that defacing Fairey's mural was wrong, but I gotta say that I was real disappointed that Fairey endorsed the censorship of Blu's work by the MOCA. That was wrong too...

If Fairey allowed himself to be used by Deitch to defend the appalling censorship of Blu's work then shame on him and shame on Deitch.

In my opinion MOCA's reputation as a truth-telling organization has been very compromised by all this, and I think that the correct way for everyone to protest this is to just think and act towards the MOCA for the tool that it actually is.


Guest 2

Guest on December 21, 2010, at 04:44PM – #51

Since when is MOCA a truth-telling organization?


Guest 23

Guest on December 21, 2010, at 06:02PM – #52

To 49: Does the truth always make you cry like this?

You think SF is going to do anything but endorse his last hi-profile cash cow commercial gallerist?

MOCA's upcoming street art show is more a joke now than ever.


Guest 2

Guest on December 21, 2010, at 09:00PM – #53

@52 hahahaha jesus you're pathetic. the fact that you think this is all about "SF" is hilarious. the people associated with R&R gallery defaced more than just "SF"'s mural, they also defaced other muralists who were actually doing actual street art. what does that do to your theory? get your shit straight before you start throwing stupid accusations around.


Guest 23

Guest on December 21, 2010, at 09:31PM – #54

"muralists"?

funny


Guest 24

Guest on December 22, 2010, at 08:57PM – #55

Vandals living by the proverbial sword also die by it.

I'm sick of self-proclaimed "artists" turning the city into one giant stall in a men's restroom.


User_32

Accessory Loft on December 22, 2010, at 11:49PM – #56

In case anyone forgot, Fairey's piece was CURATED and placed on the building WITH the owner's permission, which doesn't really fit into the whole 'street art' concept of sneaking around the middle of the night putting up your work hoping not to get arrested. If Fairey had just randomly put up his work w/o anyone's permission, it would have been ok for another artist to add to it/cover it/whatever. That's 'street art.' Taking calculated steps to climb a wall and spray some shitty geometric shapes is just plain stupid, boring, and oh yeah - vandalism. If you're an artist wanting to start a conversation, at least make the 'art' (and I use that term loosely) interesting to look at and discuss. The crap you put on that wall looks like it was made by a 12 yr old. I will not be supporting R and R anytime soon. Their response was ridiculous and whoever is in charge of writing press releases needs to go back to Art Theory 101 and learn how to write. PS - I'm not a fan of Fairey's work, but I do respect the way he works.


Guest 25

Guest on December 24, 2010, at 10:06AM – #57

Surely, somewhere, there's an attorney who would be willing to represent Fairey, without retainer.


Glenn Primm on December 24, 2010, at 02:00PM – #58

The real problem with putting this mural up so high is that it makes it more difficult for art lovers to piss on it.

More critically, the vandal(s) could have been a tad more creative with the spray paint.


Guest 26

Guest on December 24, 2010, at 07:34PM – #59

Shepard Fairey is a Plagiarist prick and it's pathetic that anyone would want him to do anything for them. It's time for him to slowly depart into the woodwork...

http://www.art-for-a-change.com/Obey/index.htm


Guest 27

Guest on January 05, 2011, at 03:47PM – #60

Thank you for this article. I am one of the artists whose painting now bears a black X. We will handle this the way graff writers do and payback is a redheaded bitch.


User_32

Corey Incognito now () on January 06, 2011, at 08:22AM – #61

Hahaha, a story about taggers mad at other taggers for tagging their tags! Graffiti, too hilarious. What a culture!


Guest 28

Guest on January 06, 2011, at 09:41AM – #62

I don't see why all you people are on this murals nuts. First off these things are everywhere so it's clearly not original, besides this guy doesn't even create his own images. So I I guess my copy machine is an artist as well. Who cares anyways he most likely got paid a pretty penny to do that mural. If you had no part in it or didn't receive any money off it then why sit here and whine like a little baby like you had any part of painting it.


Guest 29

Guest on January 06, 2011, at 09:51AM – #63

first off, realize shepard fairy is a joke then look at your statements and realize this post shouldnt be popular but it is ONLY because of his name. second, if you dont believe me, look it up

-someone who actually looks at streetart


Guest 30

Guest on January 06, 2011, at 01:43PM – #64

I think its pretty cool. Get over yourselves


Guest 2

Guest on January 07, 2011, at 09:56PM – #65

It's pathetically clear that all the comments relating to how lame Fairey is are being made by wannabes who would trade their left nut for even one tenth of his success. Regardless the so-called Arts District died years ago so who really cares.


Johnny Tergo on January 12, 2011, at 03:11AM – #66

Regardless of where you stand on the issue of the new artwork at the location of the old Shepard Fairey piece. I'm sure you can find it comical that a person who has not only helped to revolutionize an old art form, but has also defaced myriads of public property in the process of building his career is now having the party involved pay for repairing the old piece. That is one of the most ridiculous things I have heard in a while! Why not take to opportunity to put up something new? As an artist I would think he would take the opportunity to put up something new, especially in the art's district where somebody is actually looking. Unlike at the mall, skate shop or online.


Chris Byers on November 17, 2011, at 07:01PM – #67

This is ridiculous. I applaud the artists for doing this. Shepard Fairey is an art thief plan and simple. I can't believe people worship this guy but hey people are stupid. Do a little research on this guy before you defend something or someone you know nothing about. If you were the one getting ripped off I'm sure you'd be delighted by how praised he is.



Add Your Voice


In an effort to prevent spam, blogdowntown commenting requires that Javascript be enabled. Please check your browser settings and try again.

 


blogdowntown Photo Pool

Photos of Downtown contributed by readers like you.

Downtown Blogs


Downtown Sites


Elsewhere