Safer Cities Backlash Hits the Media

By Eric Richardson
Published: Thursday, February 01, 2007, at 11:23AM

Last night saw two stories on Downtown’s homeless situation hit the Internet. They bring two different angles to the issue, but both are negative toward LAPD’s enforcement of the Safer Cities initiative Downtown.

The first, running in the Times, says that the Downtown crackdown is causing overflow at service providers in other areas. The other, obviously written before that story went up, runs in the Weekly and accuses the Times of missing the real story in its recent praise of Safer Cities.

It seems to me that both stories fail to deliver a reasoned take on what’s really happening Downtown.

This is going to be a little longer than my typical post here, so bear with me…

The Scattering Numbers Game

Ashraf Khalil and Cara Mia DiMassa paint the picture of a city that’s being overrun with homeless who are fleeing Downtown’s persecution.

While shelters and homeless service organizations in Pasadena, Glendale and the San Fernando Valley report no noticeable uptick in numbers, shelters to the south and west – the places skid row denizens can directly reach by bus and by foot – tell a different story.

“It’s been a nightmare,” said Brenda Wilson, president of New Image Shelter near the Los Angeles Coliseum. “We’re beyond bulging. Food and supplies are way over budget.”

Wilson, a 17-year veteran of local homeless services, said the situation at her shelter worsened soon after the LAPD crackdown began last fall. The 400-bed shelter was suddenly overflowing, and Wilson had to hire security guards to turn away people at the door.

“We were turning away 200 people a night,” she said. “It’s overwhelming – more than we can stand.”

Let’s put things in perspective here. The quoted high count in September was 1800. The November 1st count, the first after Safer Cities enforcement started, was 1187. The following count was 1391 (you can see all these numbers via the Downtown Homeless Map). We have no data for the time between September and November. At the high end, though, you’ve got the possibility that Downtown’s street-sleeping population dropped by 600 when Safer Cities took effect. That ignores traditional population drops over the winter, but we’ll use that number for now.

Did 1/3 of those who left Downtown’s streets (the streets, mind you, not the shelters) suddenly turn up at New Image’s door wanting a bed? That seems an entirely unreasonable assumption.

Captain Smith thinks there might be something else to it.

“What I think is happening is people are just noticing it more,” Smith said. ”I’ve been getting calls from as far away as San Diego, saying they’ve got our homeless… Everybody can’t be getting them.”

Can We Believe the Numbers?

The Weekly piece is highly skeptical of LAPD’s numbers when it comes to drug arrests.

Rubin of the Journal, however, does the real work and unpacks, in rather harrowing detail, those seemingly glossy numbers. Of the 1,400 arrests made by undercover cops since the Skid Row sweep began last summer, Rubin reports, a mind-blowing 1,093 were categorized as cases of “possession for sale.” Think about that for a moment. The LAPD and the D.A. are claiming that they busted more than a thousand dealers in five months in one small area of the city? Who does that leave as their client base? Unless I’m missing something, the cops’ own stats give the lie to the official version.

Let’s get one thing straight. The buyers and sellers of drugs Downtown do not live here. They come here for the drug market. Yes, there are addicts Downtown. Yes, these people are preyed on by the drug sellers. But do these dealers come Downtown simply to sell to those living on the streets? Absolutely not.

Skid Row has been the way it has because it was a “safe” place to come buy and use drugs. Individuals would come from all over the City to make their score and then use their dope on the streets. At home there were people who might see. On Skid Row one was anonymous, just another of Downtown’s homeless population.

One thousand arrests for dealing does not mean one thousand dealers. The sad state of the justice system means a guy can get busted one day and be back selling on the street just a few days later. It would be very interesting to know what the repeat rate is in that arrest statistic.

What Makes the Numbers Drop?

So what is driving the drop in the number of individuals on the street?

First, enforcement. Yes, Safer Cities is driving down the counts, but it’s doing it by making Skid Row a far tougher environment in which to buy and sell drugs. When the dope man’s not here, the customer base goes down. Skid Row’s not as fun of a place to use when you know the cops are coming around.

Second, weather. The last month has been cold and now wet, and the number of people on the street has gone down accordingly. The January 1st count was 1146. Since then the weather’s been crappy and we’ve seen counts of 875 and 812. Is that just a coincidence? The December 1st count fell right after some crappy weather and it was significantly lower than either of the counts around it.

We Need Safer Cities to Continue

I’ve said time and time again that there will be no way to improve the situation for Downtown’s homeless until the drugs are pushed out of Skid Row. The drug situation looks to most eyes like homelessness, but it isn’t.

We must drive away those who come Downtown to sell and to score in order to be able to help those who are truly in need. It’s vital to Downtown and to this City that the Safer Cities initiative be continued and that Central division be allowed to keep the fifty officers assigned to it for that task. There’s a lot of good going on down here, and it’s time to keep working.






Comments

1
David Kennedy writes:

You are surprised? Any effort to enforce order on the streets of skid row will provoke the media allies of the skid row service providers. These kinds of articles are routine boilerplate.

These service providers have failed abysmally in the past generation to improve the lot of the ‘homeless’ and only created the lawlessness which has been endemic to skid row for more than a generation. I’m highly skeptical of their ‘compassion’ and the efficacy of their services.

However, the neighborhood has changed. A generation ago, this part of the city was abandoned. The city’s social policy was one of convenience. Dump the problems here and allow the service providers to ‘do their thing’ without any oversight. Well, the likes of us live here now. We see no reason why these social problems should be dumped in our neighborhood. The law should be applied uniformly across the city.

I suggest the service providers adjust their standard operating procedures to deal with this new reality. Simply asserting that nothing should change is an incredibly self-serving policy. Moreover, it is galling given their history of extraordinary failure.

# on Feb.01.2007 AT 01:00 PM
2
David Kennedy writes:

I’d also point out neither article seeks the input of anyone who works, lives or shops in downtown. That is, those of us who actually benefit from this change. Why shouldn’t we expect basic law and order just like Brentwood? Why should our quality of life be sacrificed for the dubious political adgenda of these service providers?

As for Mr. Cooper’s breathless speculations about a conspiracy between the LAPD and the L.A. Times – for which he offers no supporting evidence – I find this to be the height of cynical and lazy journalism.

# on Feb.01.2007 AT 04:26 PM
3
DK writes:

Just two things:

why on earth is homeless in quotes?

More importantly, you say that “the law should be applied uniformly across the city.” Touche. Except the entire point of this critical story (the Daily Journal’s not Marc Cooper, he wasn’t doing any reporting, duh) is that THE LAW IS NOT BEING APPLIED UNIFORMLY. The story details how non-violent, new offenders are being given 4 years for basic possession offenses, selling $2 worth of crack to support an addiction. Do you think when Nicole Ritchie, or anyone else in Brentwood, gets caugght with drugs they get sent to state prison for 4-12 years?

Do you read the news or just take some predictable stance on it?

# on Feb.01.2007 AT 04:37 PM
4
Lou writes:

E;

Thanks for putting this story out there. I am homeless. While I am not a drug user, nor am I am drunk, I get asked this all the time by service provides, police and people who come to my blog.

I would like to say “thanks” for putting the truth out there for all to see. Now if we can just get agencies who provide services to stop doing the crap they do and come up with real ways of helping the homeless, then maybe we can turn this thing around.

# on Feb.01.2007 AT 04:37 PM
5
Kenarch writes:

I am not surprised at the “sudden media frenzy” that has appeared over this issue. I was in Santa Monica yesterday evening, and sure, I saw plenty of homeless there - just like every other time I’ve visited that beautiful city for the past twenty plus years. I think that this story has been driven, at least in part, by the self-serving interests of those in other, more “upscale” parts of LA and the surrounding county that for some bizarre reason often display extreme hostility toward Downtown. The dumping of homeless from other parts of LA City and County in Downtown has been well documented. I cannot fathom why people from areas where this dumping originated would be so hostile toward a place that has effectively been their convenient, invisible dumping ground for so many years. Then again, the same mentality surfaces in international politics, whereas, say, the US uses places like Mexico and Africa (either directly or covertly, or by proxy) as dumping grounds for all sorts of toxins, garbage, etc… and then excoriates those same countries when they begin to pick themselves off the mat and become assertive, voiciferous members of the community. Homeless people are NOT toxins or garbage, and Downtown is not “another country” (though it might not be a bad idea) - yet we see the same attitude as Downtown rises from its years of decreptitude to take its place as the dynamic, muscular center of this great city. Homelessness is a city-wide problem first, area-wide second… Downtown’s refusal to be the “dumping ground” (I hate that term, so suggest a better one…?) - has been a long time coming. At the very least, this media driven skewering of the facts might refocus a lot of people outside Downtown on working toward a real solution - a solution that can ripple out and take root regionally, statewide, nationally… like so much else that started in LA.

# on Feb.01.2007 AT 09:32 PM
6
Dennis writes:

I find it hard to be sympathetic with other areas of L.A. County, including West L.A. who are “suddenly” reporting a spike in homeless people and complaining that their pristine neighborhoods are getting overrun. Downtown L.A. has for too long been the rug that the city swept their nasty secret under, so that those of us downtown were bearing the brunt of responsibility.

This is a human issue, that everyone needs to take responsibility for - including the westside entitled “stroller pushers” who might be inconvenienced by being panhandled while they sip their lattes out in front of their Starbucks in Brentwood. Welcome to the club, folks.

# on Feb.02.2007 AT 09:43 AM
7
Scott Mercer writes:

The more I read/consume most media, and the L.A. Times is just one of the more egregeious examples, the more I realize that their overarching purpose is not reporting or finding some kind of “truth,” but molding facts into various memes that will goose their ratings/readership numbers. Here we have yet another one: Scary Homeless leave their cage in Skid Row and Invade City! Our Children are no longer safe! What a crock.

Thanks Eric, for throwing some cold water on this needlessly whipped-up hysteria. Now if only the publications in this town would interview someone who lives here…

# on Feb.02.2007 AT 10:15 AM
8
Benjamin Pezzillo writes:

Eric, I couldn’t agree with you more.

The humanitarian problem that is Skid Row cannot be effectively addressed until the Downtown narcotics marketplace is dealt a severe and ever-lasting blow. We need to end the flow of people coming Downtown to score their fix while applying pressure to the street dealers and gangs behind them so that the unified message is clear – the days of old are no more.

In addition, whether other parts of the City and County like it or not, homeless services must be decentralized. Otherwise, we are only go to relocate Skid Row, not solve the underlying conditions which created it. This is a problem which the region created and it is a problem the region must solve.

Finally, it amazes to see celebrities fly to far away places to draw attention to humanitarian problems yet ignore the one going on in the city they call home. It’s not as if they don’t come Downtown to shoot the films which make them millions.

# on Feb.02.2007 AT 04:57 PM
9
Don Garza writes:

Captain Smith tells us about the counts this February vs. Last February at my blog. I just posted an interview after tonights neighborhood watch walk in skid row

# on Feb.07.2007 AT 11:28 PM

Your Comment:

YOUR INFORMATION:

Want blogdowntown to remember you?
Create a user account or log in.

Name:
Email:
URL:
GUIDELINES:
  • Comments should be on the topic of the post or they will be removed.
  • Use the live preview below to see how your comment will look before posting.
  • Keep it civil, everyone. If you're attacking people instead of arguments, or being overly profane, expect your comment to get deleted.

FORMATTING BASICS:

blogdowntown uses Markdown formatting.

_Italics_
__Bold__
<http://url.to.link>
[link text](http://url)

COMMENT:

Preview

Start typing...