Street Widening Rules Need More Time

By Eric Richardson
Published: Monday, March 13, 2006, at 04:50PM

An interesting motion came through the City Council referal document today. You might recall that back to July Jan Perry asked for street widening requirements to be examined in pedestrian-oriented zones. That process is moving, but not very quickly, and in the mean-time projects like Elleven are coming close to opening.

The new motion, moved by Perry and seconded by Tom LaBonge, asks that the funds that would be required for widening be placed in an account while the new rules are figured out. If the new rules still require South Group to pay for widening the streets, then the money's there. If not, though, the money would instead be used for pedestrian and alternative transportation enhancements.

I think this idea is great. The developers are still on the hook (well, except in this case it's CRA money), so it can't be said that new rules would give them unfair benefits. And yet the pedestrian character of the neighborhood is not only kept, but enhanced. Very cool.



Comments

1
Joel C writes:

So glad to know that somebody is interested in rethinking our urban design rules. We need to be encouraging sidewalk traffic, not street traffic. Esp. in a residential area (even if it is a dense one).

I'd like to see some consideration of reducing building setback requirements, as well.

# on Mar.15.2006 AT 01:37 PM

Your Comment:

YOUR INFORMATION:
Name:
Email:
URL:
  • Comments should be on the topic of the post or they will be removed.
  • Use the live preview below to see how your comment will look before posting.
  • Keep it civil, everyone. If you're attacking people instead of arguments, or being overly profane, expect your comment to get deleted.

FORMATTING BASICS:

blogdowntown uses Markdown formatting.

_Italics_
__Bold__
<http://url.to.link>
[link text](http://url)

COMMENT:

Preview

Start typing...