Which Way, L.A.? on Grand Ave Project

By Eric Richardson
Published: Tuesday, February 13, 2007, at 11:11AM

Timely considering today's votes, yesterday's edition of Which Way, L.A.? was about the Grand Avenue Project and whether such a private development should receive public subsidies. I haven't had a chance to listen yet, but back in my commuting days Warren Olney's show was my favorite on KCRW.

While I don't pretend that the Grand Avenue Project is a savior of Downtown, I think this is just another piece of the puzzle and look forward to seeing it approved and built. Certainly $100 million is nothing when compared to the longterm rewards of the project and of a vibrant Downtown.

Update (12:30pm): And the project passes through City Council unanimously.

Update (2:15pm): Within an hour after the vote the Downtown News pushed a breaking news story to their website.



Comments

1
Tim Quinn writes:

Most of that money is to help create affordable housing in the complex with very strict requirements that it actually be on the property and have the same entrance as the rest of the residential units. These units are set aside for people or families earning less than 35% of the median income. If the city requires this they have to help to make it happen. Building costs are out of sight right now. This is a very good thing, and it would not happen if it were totally market driven.

# on Feb.13.2007 AT 11:21 AM
2
lastraphanger writes:

I agree--just approve the damn thing and build it. It's a hell of a lot better than what's there now--which is nothing but hideous parking structures and lots.

# on Feb.13.2007 AT 11:54 AM
3
Joel C writes:

This City Council has now approved unanimously. The supes haven't voted on it yet.

# on Feb.13.2007 AT 02:11 PM
4
Kenarch writes:

...and in the last sentence of the DT News article is a little bit of good ol' fashioned protectionism... the Westin Bonaventure certainly doesn't want any 5 star hotel nearby.

We're all far from perfect, but as I sit here working in my humble loft in the funky, gritty but interesting Fashion District, and I think of how other developers (Tom Gilmore, for example) have really worked above and beyond the minimum to help bring up Downtown, I am reminded of just why the Bunker Hill / Financial District feels like... a ghost town. Sure, the tax subsidies are controversial. Does the Mandarin Oriental mean a death knell for the well established, high quality Bonaventure? Of course not. Shove the lawyers in a place where the sun doesn't shine and get on with the project... it will ultimately benefit everyone, the Bonaventure included.

# on Feb.13.2007 AT 02:39 PM
5
Haven writes:

It is great to have this project approved, i hope construction starts this year. I cant wait to have the horid parking structure across Disney Hall demolished. Kenarch - your right about the Bonaventure - they were all up in arms about the LA live hotel before as well, they complained and threatened until they were given to OK to convert their hotel partially to condos if they chose. Now they're complaining again..!..

# on Feb.13.2007 AT 04:28 PM
6
Ankur writes:

the Bonaventure does not understand that all these project will mean a more vibrant downtown, with conventions, and more people going to their generic hotel!

God, soo short sighted.

# on Feb.14.2007 AT 11:26 AM

Your Comment:

YOUR INFORMATION:
Name:
Email:
URL:
  • Comments should be on the topic of the post or they will be removed.
  • Use the live preview below to see how your comment will look before posting.
  • Keep it civil, everyone. If you're attacking people instead of arguments, or being overly profane, expect your comment to get deleted.

FORMATTING BASICS:

blogdowntown uses Markdown formatting.

_Italics_
__Bold__
<http://url.to.link>
[link text](http://url)

COMMENT:

Preview

Start typing...