USC and Urban Partners Win Decisive Victory Against Conquest Housing
DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES — The lawsuit between USC and Conquest Student Housing, filed back in September, has produced some concrete results. A settlement has been signed prohibiting Conquest from "challenging and interfering with any current or future University of Southern California (USC) development project, any Urban Partners project and any student housing project undertaken by private developers within two miles of USC’s University Park campus."
In other words, that tactic of fighting competition via environmental lawsuits is probably toast. Various city councilmembers should be glad to hear this. Councilwoman Jan Perry was quoted in the lawsuit as being "stunned and disappointed and disgusted" by Conquest's suit against the Herald Examiner project, on which Urban Partners was a consultant.
Part of the settlement involves Conquest immediately dropping nine lawsuits against Urban Partners projects. The settlement is filed with the court, meaning that the district judge has the right to intervene and impose sanctions should the terms be violated.
The release from Urban Partners is after the jump.
Conquest Student Housing Permanently Prohibited from Interfering with Housing Projects Near USC
Long Delayed University Gateway Projects to Proceed
Los Angeles, Calif. (January 25, 2008) – Conquest Student Housing, LLC and its principals are prohibited from challenging and interfering with any current or future University of Southern California (USC) development project, any Urban Partners project and any student housing project undertaken by private developers within two miles of USC’s University Park campus, as a result of a stipulated permanent injunction entered into the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The permanent injunction is part of a legal settlement between Conquest, USC and Urban Partners, the developer of a proposed mixed-use student housing development for USC students.
The settlement follows a ruling last month by the United States District Court, which rejected Conquest’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by USC and Urban Partners alleging a lengthy campaign by Conquest to monopolize the student housing market around USC by attacking competing development projects, including Urban Partners’ University Gateway Project. The U.S. District Court refused to dismiss the lawsuit on First Amendment and other grounds.
“Today’s settlement allows USC to focus on meeting the housing needs of our students without fear of vexatious litigation designed to monopolize the student housing market around campus,” said Michael L. Jackson, Vice President of Student Affairs for USC. “We eagerly anticipate the opening of the University Gateway project, and the vitally needed housing it will provide to more than 1,600 USC students. We hope to see expanded interest in developing additional student housing now that the threat of interference and litigation from Conquest is gone.”
The permanent injunction entered by the Court on January 23, 2008 was stipulated and agreed upon by all parties in the case -- including Conquest and its principals -- as part of the parties’ settlement of the Federal Court lawsuit and related claims. Because the permanent injunction was entered with the Court, the Court will retain jurisdiction over the case and can impose sanctions on Conquest or its principals if they violate the terms of the injunction.
In addition, as a result of the settlement, Conquest is required to take action to immediately dismiss nine lawsuits that Conquest initiated involving current or former Urban Partners projects, including University Gateway. The injunction paves the way for University Gateway to move forward, with groundbreaking expected this June.
“Urban Partners is elated by the permanent injunction entered by the United States District Court against Conquest and its related entities. It puts behind us years of baseless, costly litigation initiated by Conquest, and allows us to immediately refocus our energy and attention on the University Gateway Project as well as our other projects that have been obstructed by Conquest’s actions,” said Matthew Burton, a Principal of Urban Partners. “The University Gateway Project was designed with the community in mind and will be a cornerstone in the redevelopment and revitalization efforts along the corridors of Jefferson Boulevard and Figueroa Street.”
USC and Urban Partners originally filed the lawsuit on September 4, 2007 in U.S. District Court, Central District of California. According to the lawsuit, Conquest violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), the Sherman Act, the California Unfair Competition laws, and other state and federal laws.
“The resolution of this case stands for the proposition that anti-competitive, commercial use or other abusive use of environmental and land-use laws is actionable under both federal and state law and is not a protected right,” said Howard Stahl and Karl Tilleman, partners at Steptoe and Johnson, LLP, which represented USC and Urban Partners in the lawsuit. “If a developer uses such laws to engage in racketeering or monopolistic activities, or other potentially unlawful conduct, there is a remedy,” Stahl and Tilleman said.
The University Gateway Project, which was delayed more than two years by Conquest’s conduct, is scheduled to break ground in June 2008.
About Urban Partners LLC
Urban Partners is a real estate investment, development planning and management firm. The company pursues select market niches where complexity or innovation creates exceptional potential for its partners and clients. Urban Partners’ business model is focused on equity-based investing and development. Urban will also provide fee development services in certain instances. Current equity projects include residential and mixed-use developments in urban core and high population growth areas of the western United States and major land development projects requiring detailed planning and entitlement strategies. Urban Partners’ projects and services include land development, mixed-use development, apartment and condominium homes, transit-oriented development, student housing, financial restructurings, built-to-suit development and the adaptive reuse of historic structures.
The company was founded in 2000 by Paul Keller, Dan Rosenfeld and the late Ira Yellin. Matthew Burton and John Hrovat became Principals of the firm in 2005 and 2006, respectively.
About the University of Southern California
Founded in 1880, USC is the oldest private research university in the western United States. USC annually enrolls more than 33,000 students in exceptional degree programs at the undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral levels. USC’s 3,200 full-time faculty provide instruction in more than 77 undergraduate majors and 139 graduate degrees, and conduct world-class research in every area of scholarly inquiry. USC is a global university, hosting the largest number of international students in the U.S. and enjoying an extensive network of programs in the Pacific Rim and around the world. Under the leadership of the institution's 10th president, Steven B. Sample, USC has become world-renowned in the fields of communication and multimedia technologies as well as in cross-disciplinary teaching and research, has received national acclaim for its innovative community outreach programs and has solidified its status as one of the leading research universities in the United States. USC is the largest private employer in Los Angeles, annually stimulating $4 billion in economic activity in Los Angeles County.
About the University Gateway Project
The eight-story University Gateway Project will be home to more than 1,600 students and will provide more than 11,000 square feet of student service facilities, including computer rooms, laundry facilities and exercise rooms. The 421-unit project will also contain 83,000 square feet of neighborhood-oriented retail, including a bookstore and restaurant. The University Gateway Project is designed to help increase the limited supply of student housing near USC and enjoys widespread support in the surrounding communities from a diverse roster of community groups and civic and elected leaders. The project will be built entirely with private money and uses no public subsidies.
Comments
Conquest is outrageous... They are currently charging me and my room-mates $6000 for a triple bedroom apartment. They quoted me $2700 a month for a single next year. There is not enough housing around campus and a bunch of us are forced to pay an outrageous amount to stay near campus. I wish that there was some sort of attack on their outright gouging of prices on students... They are dishonest, fine 6% if rent isn't paid by the 4th day of each month, charged a $500 fine for borrowing hallway chairs and threatened to evict us. I find it ironic that they advertise themselves as affordable- for the same price I could have rented a a bigger, better apartment in Hollywood.
# on Feb.06.2008 AT 03:56 AMMike, you have no credibility at all. I live at Tuscany. Everyone in the building knows you were the one that stole the hallway furniture and messed up our common area. I know this because Conquest sent the picture from their security camera around to every tenant to find out who the thief in the building was. I wish they had evicted you. Low lifes like you who steal only ruin the quality of life in our building. Also, what are you talking about $6,000 for a 3BR at Tuscany? Everyone knows that 3BRs there are only $4,000. Please move to the so called "bigger better" apartments in Hollywood. The USC community will be better off without you.
# on Mar.18.2008 AT 05:58 PMIt seems that USC is definitely winning here and Urban Partners and Conquest are the losers. Both Urban Partners and Conquest have no way of surviving in the USC student housing market. USC just released its Master Plan which will guarantee a housing spot for every single undergraduate student and one year of housing for all graduate students that choose to live in the area. See www.usc.edu/masterpan. This all starts in 2011 when the no build clause on 20 acre University Village expires. Looks like USC cleverly manipulated Urban Partners and Conquest to duke it out, and USC will reap all the benefits.
# on Mar.18.2008 AT 08:14 PMFrom what I've heard, this University Gateway project will charge pretty high rents. I don't see how they will be able to do that considering there are so many great deals already available in the area. All the major housing providers still have availability (City Park, CDI, Nupac, Conquest, etc) and all at really great prices. City Park is a new building at has 1BR apts for $1,250, 2BR apts for $1,850. and 3BR apts for $2,500. I can't imagine how much these providers will need to drop rents once USC adds enough housing to provide a spot for every student.
# on Mar.18.2008 AT 09:25 PMUSC has been decreasing the size of its freshman class for a couple years now. This is one of the contributing factors to the decrease in rents around the campus. When I was going to USC several years ago, each class had about 3,100 people. Now each class is about 2,700 people. This is partly to make the university more exclusive, but also so that they will be capable of providing housing for each student as part of their Master Plan.
# on Mar.18.2008 AT 09:30 PMI also found a good price for an apartment for next year. It seems to be a continuing trend that prices are becoming more affordable (seems like supply has finally caught up to demand in the USC area). I'm renting from Fox Wilkins on Ellendale Place, just 2 blocks from campus. This building is only about 10 years old and I'm paying $2,000 for a 2BR. I'm not sure if this University Gateway project will survive if it's trying to get much higher rents than this.
# on Mar.19.2008 AT 04:54 PMI've been reading all the comments above, and it seems like the USC market has already come to a slowdown based on the leases people above are signing. A big factor that has led to this is the increased supply that has come on line in the last few years. USC built a few new dorms on campus (called Parkside) and now has a sophomore guarantee, meaning they guarantee housing for all freshman and sophomores. Also, Conquest built 6 new buildings and added enough supply for about 1,000 students. Plus all the new supply downtown has drawn students to that area.
# on Mar.20.2008 AT 11:43 AMI live in the Medici downtown and it is basically all students from USC. There are some chicks and gay dudes from FIDM as well. We pay $2,150 per month in rent for a two bedroom apartment and we have all the pimped out amenities including tennis courts, pools, spas, steam rooms, gyms etc. etc. Even the prices here at the Medici are way down. It used to be $2,600 for a two bedroom. The guy that owns Medici has built a ton more apartments at Orsini and Piero and one other one which brought the prices down in all of them. I think this is a major reason that nobody in this blog is discussing. Downtown has some phat buildings at really great prices and is only a mile from campus.
# on Mar.22.2008 AT 07:55 AMThey're getting/keeping their vacancy rate as low as possible previous to completion of all those South Park condos that aren't going to sell and will be rented instead. And the prices will sink. I wonder if FIDM is still proceeding with it's own apartment tower..?
# on Mar.22.2008 AT 11:18 AMAt USC, there are currently 16,729 (a decrease from the previous year) undergraduate students. 2,763 are freshman who are required to live in the dorms their first year. The University houses an additional 3,259 undergrads in its on and off campus facilities which are priced artificially low since the University has a “break-even-no profit” policy. Because these units are well located, well operated and offered at a discount, they lease out first. The University estimates that approximately 1,600 undergraduates who are members of fraternities and sororities live on “the row” just north of campus. 1,268 are non-freshman international students and 1,297 are transfer students. Graduate students, transfer students and international students tend to want their own apartment with one roommate at most. They are typically older, done with their partying and not as social as undergraduates. They are also much more budget conscience and therefore commute from a place with more affordable apartments. This would leave 6,542 undergrads in the market for off campus housing. there are already 10,000 beds in this market and USC, downtown developers and SC student housing developers keep adding more supply. Of course prices go down......they are going to keep going down and these crazy developers who can not stop building are going to lose their asses!
# on Mar.25.2008 AT 09:33 AM


Council Vetoes Pershing...
Broadway Effort Would...
Broadway Effort Would...
Should L.A. Emulate...
Broadway Effort Would...
City Clerk Releases...
Broadway Effort Would...
City Clerk Releases...
Broadway Effort Would...
City Clerk Releases...