blogdowntown
Not currently logged in. [Login or Create an Account]

Stay Connected



 

ExpressPark Aims to Give Smarts to Downtown's Parking Spots

By Eric Richardson
Published: Wednesday, December 01, 2010, at 11:06AM
New Credit Card Meter on 9th Eric Richardson []

10,000 new parking meters that accept credit card payments were installed by the city this summer.

The streets of Downtown should get a whole lot smarter in 2011 as implementation work gets underway on ExpressPark, an ambitious parking management system that designed to give the city’s Department of Transportation and the public a real-time view of 5,500 on-street and 7,500 off-street parking spaces.

The department will use that data to alter rates at ExpressPark zones throughout Downtown, raising or lowering them up to 50 percent in order to achieve a 70 to 90 percent occupancy rate.

While that aspect of the program has gotten the most media attention, project manager Peer Ghent says it's only a piece of the puzzle. "The part that's never been done is the management system to integrate all these different systems," he says of the smart meters, parking sensors and web interfaces included in the project.

The city's parking meter technology has already gotten smarter in recent years. Pay stations were deployed on some Downtown blocks in 2008, and earlier this year the city deployed 10,000 smart parking meters across the city. The new technologies allow drivers to pay for their parking with a credit card and are more resistant to the tampering that has plagued traditional meters. Requirements for ExpressPark call for cell phone payments to be added to that mix.

ExpressPark's most noticeable addition will be the installation of sensors in those 5,500 on-street spaces that will communicate their availability back to the management system. That data will then be communicated in real-time to message boards on the street, a website that the city will set up and the . The requirements even call for ties allowing both pricing and availability data to find its way into in-vehicle GPS systems.

Despite the ambitious aims, Downtowners won't see a lot in the way of torn-up streets. Construction will take place to install the parking sensors, but most of the rest of the work will take place behind the scenes. "The meters themselves are not challenging," says Ghent, who calls the hardware and software on the backend "the real guts of the project."

Those new parking meters installed this summer may stay, or they may not. The city is leasing the units currently on the streets, and it will be up to the winning bidder on the ExpressPark project to recommend what hardware the system should use. Those new units will be purchased instead of rented.

The program is federally-funded as part of Metro's project, aimed at congestion relief on the 10 and 110 freeways. Proposals are due in two weeks from companies interested in implementing the system for the city. A winning bid will be chosen in February, and installation is required to be completed by October.

While Ghent and the city hope that ExpressPark's smarts will make parking simpler and reduce the time drivers spend looking for a space, the program won't solve all of Downtown's parking woes.

State law mandates that drivers with handicap placards can park free and for an unlimited time at any meter, so no amount of rate tweaking will affect availability at spots currently filled by placard parkers.

The system also won't eliminate traffic crunches around major events. "If there's a Laker game, it's going to be congested regardless of what we do," Ghent notes.

Still, Ghent thinks the system has a lot of promise. "If somebody can get excited about parking meters, this is the time."

SHARE:

||

Related Stories:


Conversation

Thomas K Nagano on December 01, 2010, at 11:42AM – #1

This is a little off subject, but when the Central City East DASH was created, Little Tokyo lost eighteen parking spaces. The city has cancelled the DASH, but the only way the city is generating revenue from these spaces is "Parking in the Red." Every parking space is important for the business owners in Little Tokyo. Let's get them metered or at least paint out the red curbs. - TK


Guest 1

Guest on December 01, 2010, at 02:11PM – #2

I wish there would be a statewide audit of handicap placards. I've talked to three people in the legal industry who are using the placards for "mental illness" -- meaning depression. WTF? That burns me up.


Chris Loos on December 01, 2010, at 03:36PM – #3

@Guest 1

Definitely a gross misuse of the placards. So...they're mentally unfit to park far from their destination, but well enough to be behind the wheel? Um...


Guest 2

Guest on December 01, 2010, at 04:27PM – #4

It doesn't make any sense to price downtown parking meters based on occupancy, when 80% are being occupied by handicapped placard users.

To do so, would be a clear manipulation of supply and demand, in order to gounge the public. Think Enron and the cost of electricity in California, or home loans with no documentation of income. You end up with hyper-inflation. Do not allow yourselves to be victimized by the City.

Not only that, but all parking meter rate changes have to have a public hearing and go before Council.

Nowhere does it say that the LADOT has the authority to change rates based on occupancy. This is a violation of the state vehicle code.

Parking meters were invented to help business owners provide continuous access to their businesses. They were never meant to be a business in themselves.

Until your representatives can retake control of parking downtown for the benefit of the residents and businesses, EVERY PLAN put forth by the LADOT should be scrutinized.

Will shopping and tourism be enhanced by this plan?

Will redevelopment be promoted?

Will downtown be easier to navigate and understand?

Will downtown be more livable?

Will the money collected from these meters go back to administer the parking district downtown?.. AS REQUIRED BY LAW.


Eric Richardson () on December 01, 2010, at 04:35PM – #5

Guest: Council has approved (though I don't think finally passed) an ordinance that would allow DOT discretion up to 50% up or down from the approved rates in these zones. It would be subject just to approval of the LADOT General Manager.


on December 01, 2010, at 10:39PM – #6

Will love not to carry change, but I wish more that they'd really rethink all the red zones. Needing red zones is one thing, but taking up 1/2 the block with red zones is crazy.


Guest 3

Guest on December 02, 2010, at 11:35AM – #7

Eric,

I believe you are correct.

What I am saying is that Council never had legal authority to give LADOT 50% discretion in parking meter rates.

There is supposed to be a public hearing each time there is a rate change.

This is in the state vehicle code in order to protect property owners and businesses FROM the City.

The laws also ensure driveway access to residential properties.

These laws have been violated repeatedly with the issuing of event permits for Fiesta Broadway and other events.

The City should review the state vehicle code and stop abusing its power....or it will be sued.


Guest 4

Guest on December 03, 2010, at 09:06AM – #8

What would be a "smart" move is the installation of a crosswalk on Spring Street between 6th and 7th street, downtown Los Angeles' most populated block. Instead the Department of Transportation feels it is a more "intelligent" use of tax payer funds to cater to automobiles not pedestrians. It is nice to see a city agency using funds to improve meters as opposed to limiting our eco-footprint with more pedestrian friendly walkways!


User_32

on December 03, 2010, at 12:11PM – #9

No mention from the LADOT about what will happen with this increased revenue? What a surprise.

The areas in the US that have made this parking fee increase work always have a component that feeds some of the cash generated directly into the district generating it. This money can support a BID, sidewalk re-paving, extra police patrols, and much more.

As of now, this money in LA goes into a big pot that is divided up amongst 15 councilmembers to spend on their pet project that help them get re-elected.


Rich Jesmer on December 03, 2010, at 10:06PM – #10

Guest #4 - I love everything on both sides of the block, but I cant think of one reason why that stretch needs a crosswalk. The waffles, kebabs, and nightclub will still be there 2 minutes later.

I think adding a crosswalk there, in addition to the congestion that builds from valet parking and filming congestion would turn the block into a parking lot.


Simon Hartigan on December 05, 2010, at 04:40PM – #11

Increasing parking fees is a great thing for downtown as it would reduce cars from our roads. Driving is still necessary sometimes and in those times you want people to be able to easily find parking. Increased fees when demand is high ensures this will happen. But driving unnecessarily and therefore clogging up our roads with cars is bad for downtown LA. People move here and come here for a vibrant walking community with lots of events. More cars is the answer for the suburbs, we're definitely not trying to be that, or am I wrong?



Add Your Voice


In an effort to prevent spam, blogdowntown commenting requires that Javascript be enabled. Please check your browser settings and try again.

 


blogdowntown Photo Pool

Photos of Downtown contributed by readers like you.

Downtown Blogs


Downtown Sites


Elsewhere