blogdowntown
Not currently logged in. [Login or Create an Account]

Stay Connected



 

Leiweke Targets 2016 Super Bowl for Downtown

By Eric Richardson
Published: Friday, November 05, 2010, at 01:21PM
Convention Center West Hall Eric Richardson []

AEG CEO Tim Leiweke is pushing plans to construct a $1-billion, retractable-roof stadium next to Staples Center and the Nokia Theatre on the site of the Convention Center's West Hall (top right).

If Tim Leiweke gets his way, the NFL's 50th Super Bowl will be played just two miles up the street from the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, the site of Super Bowl I.

The AEG CEO is pushing hard on plans to build a $1-billion, retractable-roof stadium next to Staples Center, and Thursday he said that he believes the timetable works.

He also believes that the project and an associated expansion of the Los Angeles Convention Center would create an events complex without equal and drive the construction of five new hotels in South Park. Once that's done, "we go after every big event that exists in the United States and the world," he told those attending a luncheon organized by Town Hall Los Angeles.

Calling the ten yearly NFL games a "centerpiece," Leiweke said that he believes the stadium would host approximately 50 events annually. That could include making L.A. Live the permanent home of the X Games, going after the Final Four and hosting a college football tournament.

Before he can get to that point, though, a number of pieces need to fall into place.

"First, we need to get a deal done with the league," Leiweke said. AEG is pushing for a commitment of three Super Bowl games in the stadium's first decade, one more than the league would typically offer. Leiweke has also previously pushed to bring the NFL draft to Los Angeles.

The second deal would be with the City of Los Angeles, owner of the Convention Center West Hall site where the stadium would rise. AEG is proposing to build a new event hall next to the I.M. Pei-designed main hall, creating a facility with nearly one million square feet of contiguous space.

That would give the facility the ability to attract top conventions and would drive the creation of what AEG believes would be five new hotels. One of them would be the facility that AEG has entitled across Olympic from L.A. Live. Leiweke has previously told blogdowntown that he was in discussions with Hard Rock, Hyatt and W about the space.

Third would come an agreement to bring an NFL team to Los Angeles. "We don't have a team in mind," Leiweke said. "That's not my place. We'll leave it up to the commissioner."

Last would come the need for private funds. While Leiweke said AEG is prepared to self-finance the stadium's $1-billion construction, naming rights and sponsorships would be an important part of making the facility pencil out. He pointed out that his company already negotiates $400 million in suite deals and sponsorships annually.

Leiweke hopes to see the stadium's entitlement process underway in January, a process that would take approximately one year. Construction of the new event hall would get underway in January 2012, and demolition of the old hall would begin in January 2013. He believes that stadium construction can be done in 30 months, allowing the facility to open for the 2015 NFL season.

SHARE:

||

Related Stories:


Conversation

Guest 1

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 01:35PM – #1

Great for Downtown. More total space plus a football stadium, plus getting rid of the outdated West Hall facilities. That'll do wonders for the convention business even without the new hotels that would be started because of it.

Question though- which hall is the "main hall"? Is that the South Hall, Concourse Hall? I'm trying to figure out where exactly the new convention space would be built on the site.


Guest 2

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 01:40PM – #2

This would be awesome. We need to get this done for sure. Downtown will once again become the epicenter for entertainment.


Guest 3

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 02:12PM – #3

South Park residents better get ready for a HUGE decrease in condo values. Who wants to live let to a staduim? Yuck! It will ruin Downtown by bringing more cars, more pollution, more crime, scalpers, t-shirt hawkers, etc, more vandalism.

I VOTE NO!!! Horrible idea. Name ONE area around a staduim that has been improved by its presence? One....anyone?

This should be fought tooth and nail!


User_32

() on November 05, 2010, at 02:31PM – #4

Would be a nice addition to the neighborhood. Maybe even a Trader Joes?


Chris Loos on November 05, 2010, at 02:38PM – #5

Once that's done, we go after every big event that exists in the United States and the world."

So...the US exists outside the rest of the world then?


Guest 4

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 02:48PM – #6

Does downtown need five more hotels?

Are any hotels making any money at all?


Simon Hartigan on November 05, 2010, at 03:12PM – #7

This will help bring the focus to downtown LA, help make it the center Southern California and this will likely bring more and more investment. Something I've noticed is that lots of investment is going into buildings, but not streets. More events will quickly make LA realize (not that it hasn't already) that cars aren't what we need and I suspect better transit will come along with people oriented streets. Entire roads with no cars because this will go well with the influx of tourists and people living here, which will likely be on foot. Even if they did drive in, their car will be parked and it's too expensive and time consuming to keep moving it, so they'll want to walk around in a pleasant, car-free atmosphere.


Guest 5

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 04:46PM – #8

Downtown needs five Trader Joe's locations!


Guest 6

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 04:47PM – #9

@ Guest #3, "Name ONE area around a staduim that has been improved by its presence? One....anyone?"

South Park... STAPLES Center. Before the arena was built, this area was a DUMP! lol, Hate to say it, but your probably living in the neighborhood that HAS been improved by an arenas/stadiums pressence.


Guest 7

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 05:05PM – #10

Who wants to live let to a staduim?

So all the surface parking lots and seedy old buildings scattered throughout South Park are doing wonders for the area right now? They're really adding value to residents' condos and apartments?

However, a traditional, football-only structure would be a killer to a community's potential. That's because you end up with a large space sitting unused or lightly used during most days of the year. And it's really deadening if it's directly encircled by dozens of acres of parking lots. Or similar to the setup of Dodgers Stadium and Chavez Ravine.

But that type of a stadium was first pondered by AEG several years ago and then canceled. In fact, I believe they sold much of the land first set aside for that project, which eventually ended up being used for new residential buildings.

By comparison, if the new plan results in a multi-purpose building versatile enough to accommodate football, exhibits, meetings and anything else requiring a large enclosed or roofless area, wedged into the area where the West Hall of the convention center is now located, that would be quite ingenious.

But I shudder to think how difficult that would be from a technical standpoint (the complexity of a huge retractable roof and sloped stadium seating that has to be adjusted for flat floor space) and the resulting budget necessary to bring it to reality.


Eric Richardson () on November 05, 2010, at 06:08PM – #11

Guest 4 asks an interesting question, whether Downtown hotels are making enough money for the neighborhood to need more of them. The answer seems to be that more hotel rooms around the Convention Center equals more conventions, which equals more overall hotel room nights, which equals better business for everyone.

At the Downtown 2020 event a few weeks back, this was the case that Jim Thomas and Tim Leiweke were making in saying why they both wanted the other to be successful. JW Marriott being successful makes it easier for the Wilshire Grand redevelopment project to find financing, and those new hotel rooms then make it easier to book conventions, events at Nokia Theatre, etc.


Guest 8

Guest on November 05, 2010, at 07:27PM – #12

I hate to admit this, because I find breeders to be especially annoying (mostly), but for Downtown to really blossom it needs to be a bit more family friendly and kid friendly. Did I just say that?

Anyone who has recently bought a loft here probably knows (or should know) that we have the largest homeless population in America living on our streets over 40,000. Mostly men. Additionaly most recent owners also must be aware that there is a very high concentration of sex offenders and parolees living Downtown, again mostly men because women and children it has been decided don't fare so well on Skid Row. The city of LA has designed things this way.

Now, we have this proposal for another huge sports arena that brings in a lot of rowdy men (its mostly men, right?)from surrounding areas to cause ruckus after games, I've seen buring cop cars, spray paint, etc. we are not surrounded by bucilic suburbia, we are surrounded by South LA with a substancial gang population as well areas to the East. Who do you think would be coming to the games?

Not family friendly fare. more like a recipe for disaster. As a single woman living DT and one that loves it, Id like to see something there that would make me feel more comfortable for myself and my breeder friends to stroll around without feeling threatened.

And before you judge me as too prissy or uptight, I live right up aginst Skid Row myself and am thrilled with the neighborhood. I'd just like a feminine touch here is all. For balance, naturally.

KM


Guest 9

Guest on November 06, 2010, at 02:08AM – #13

Sounds like Kim went through a tough break up. I'm there for you, Kim. And, yes I am a man.


Guest 10

Guest on November 06, 2010, at 11:08AM – #14

I`m sure he meant ^and the rest of the world....such technicalities !


Guest 11

Guest on November 06, 2010, at 11:17AM – #15

i like turtles


on November 06, 2010, at 11:27AM – #16

Stadiums and Arenas and Convention Centers definitely revitalize cities! San Francisco, Baltimore, South Park in LA (think before and after Staples), Denver - and this is just off the top of my head without thinking!


Guest 12

Guest on November 06, 2010, at 12:14PM – #17

The key to revitalizing neighborhoods is that the stadium/arena/convention center in question needs to be a constant beehive of activity. Staples was so successful in revitalizing South Park because it's one of the busiest arenas in the world, providing a nearly constant stream of patrons for neighboring businesses.

Most football stadiums fail at this because there are too few events which are able to utilize an outdoor venue of that size. Likewise, pre-LA Live the LA Convention Center was a money pit and did nothing for the surrounding community because it wasn't able to book the needed conventions.

LA Live has changed everything. Between Staples, Nokia, the hotel, and the Regal cinemas that part of downtown is bustling with life most days of the year. Convention business is up significantly. If this stadium/event facility can hold 50 events per year and make LA into a top 5 convention city, then downtown will be completely transformed. Hotels, restaurants, and shops will spring up everywhere to try and capture that money. And yes, condo values will skyrocket.


Chris Loos on November 06, 2010, at 02:33PM – #18

@Karen Liljegren

I can't speak for San Francisco, but having moved here from DC I can speak pretty authoritatively when I say that the M&T Bank Stadium and Camden Yards have done little to revitalize that area. Its still ugly, amenity poor, and unsafe. Which is understandable considering its surrounded by acres of parking lots and parking structures.

The impact of new convention centers is overblown as well. The Washington DC Convention Center was supposed to revitalize the neighborhood of Shaw, and of course the reverse happened. The hulking 3-block long superstructure sits in the middle of the residential neighborhood creating a massive wall. As true, organic gentrification finally hit Shaw from the west, the Convention Center actually acted as a barrier, keeping investment from penetrating the east side of the neighborhood.

Convention centers and stadiums are not panaceas for the neighborhoods they're built in. They are money-making machines for the developers. That's all. I'm not against them, but lets call a spade a spade.


Guest 13

Guest on November 06, 2010, at 06:23PM – #19

It will only work if Pink's Hot Dogs opens a second location next to the stadium.


Guest 14

Guest on November 07, 2010, at 11:13AM – #20

The developer needs to pay for the new LA streetcar.

The only way this proposal should be considered is if the project assures that the rest of downtown benefits. Building a Sports and Entertainment District that captures all of the business within the walls of the complex will not result in a healthy, business friendly, environment downtown.

We need to negotiate for the future of downtown!

In order to be heard, we need a single council office. Redistricting is coming soon.


Guest 15

Guest on November 07, 2010, at 11:16AM – #21

re:20, you do realize that almost all the restaurants and bars in south park and the financial district benefit GREATLY from Staples Center and Nokia events right? just ask any bar or restaurant owner.

D


User_32

J-M on November 07, 2010, at 12:05PM – #22

In two words: Hell No!!!


User_32

Roger Christensen on November 07, 2010, at 03:17PM – #23

Yes! Financial support of the LA Streetcar would be a great mitigation!


User_32

J-M on November 07, 2010, at 07:26PM – #24

In that case, how about building the infrastructure first? I know that's a novel idea in Los Angeles, but I cannot imagine how this will impact the streets of Downtown and I'm not ready to surrender to hordes of football fans just yet. I've seen Lakers celebrations; imagine Raiders fans... Besides, it's way too close to the center of town. Again, Hell No! What are you thinking?!? Oh, tons of money, of course.


Guest 8

Guest on November 07, 2010, at 07:46PM – #25

imagine living across the street or two blocks away from Disneyland, or Universal Studios. what about right behind a Las Vegas casino? sound fun? are neighborhoods directly surrounding these types of enormous projects ever made better? it seems like they would be made worse--the neighborhood that is--no doubt other people not living directly next these venues make money off these things. not arguing that.


Guest 16

Guest on November 07, 2010, at 08:01PM – #26

He's kidding us, right? Exactly HOW can he replace the same amount of square footage as now exists in West Hall and construct a 72,000 seat event center both within the area bounded by 11th, Pico, the existing atrium and the Harbor Freeway?? And allow for emergency access (fire rigs) all along the perimeters??

Take a look at the Coliseum on Google Earth and then pan up to the Convention Center and I think you'll start to see what I'm saying. Before any o.k.s are granted, both the City Convention and Visitors Bureau and the City Council had best get some independent planning analysis on this. Otherwise, after this train gets under way, he'll come back and say gee shucks, looks like we'll have to span 11th Street and we have to have some public assistance and he'll want the replacement hall to go on the north side of the "Event Center" and if that were to happen, you gots yourself a strung-out, from here to eternity convention facility which exhibitors do not like and how are you gonna handle a weekend playoff game and the L.A. Car Show on the same day? Car enthusiasts would stay away and the Car Show would never come back.


Guest 15

Guest on November 07, 2010, at 08:38PM – #27

Re; #26! wow im glad you thought of that cause it probably slipped his mind! are you retarded? dont you think they would have thought of seeing if the project actually fits before floating it? and who said the west hall replacement and the event center are going into the same space?

D


Guest 15

Guest on November 07, 2010, at 08:42PM – #28

also re #26. the convention space now is the reason that conventions dont come. it is disjointed. the new addition will make it seamless according to AEG. Also, They have had the car show, a lakers game and an event at Nokia at the same time, drawing over 100,000 with minimal issues, i think they could handle it. The main traffic impact on downtown has always been the 110 and part of Figueroa until 8th. go down two blocks on any given event night and no traffic impacts at all. Also, the traffic would only be for 2 hours tops an event day. an hour before and at most and hour after. hardly a big deal. after all, you are living in the middle of the second largest city in the USA.


Guest 17

Guest on November 07, 2010, at 11:03PM – #29

No 8: As compared with much of what's there right now? A mostly depressed community that has seen limited improvement and only a modest amount of new development over the past 60 or more years.

It's easy to walk around or drive through way too much of the southern half of downtown and sense that it's as semi-abandoned and economically starved today as it was 30 years ago. That's because beyond the token areas of LA Live, the convention center and a few new condo or apartment buildings (the latter occupying perhaps no more than a grand total of three or four blocks worth of land, max), it's still slim pickings in that part of downtown.


User_32

J-M on November 08, 2010, at 09:39AM – #30

There's no evidence that a football stadium will lift the surrounding neighborhood out of poverty. I've seen too many blighted areas that football fans drive in and out of as soon as they can. They buy beer, crappy stadium food and football jerseys; that's it. Look no further than the Coliseum for an example of a blighted neighborhood near a functioning sports complex. Also, I used to live in the South Park area, Guest #29, and I can tell you it doesn't look like it did five years ago, let alone 30. That neighborhood is coming along just fine and will probably develop just as well without the NFL, if not better. If Tim Leiweke was that concerned about Downtown's well being, he would have built a stadium 10 or 15 years ago. The Staples Center has done just that, but another massive sports complex is overkill. Actually, I think a football stadium would kill that neighborhood for residents.


Guest 1

Guest on November 08, 2010, at 11:10AM – #31

@J-M: Since when is it the job of one project to "lift the surrounding neighborhood out of poverty"? I'd like see some local hiring on the project for construction and operations, but let's not create unrealistic hoops for AEG to jump through.


Guest 18

Guest on November 08, 2010, at 11:46AM – #32

it just seems as though J-M has a bone to pick with AEG.

I would share the same concerns if this project was on prime land, lets say Olympic and Grand, but its not, its in the very edge of South park, shoehorned between a freeway and the convention center, a perfect spot for the event center. its not as though anyone was going to build condos or mixed use there.

D


Scott Mercer on November 08, 2010, at 12:56PM – #33

AEG should pay for a light rail subway that would take the Expo Line off the Blue Line tracks, with an underground station under Figueroa, servicing Staples/LA Live/new footbal stadium.

It would be a stub end terminal adjoining the 7th Metro stop, which could be accessed by foot from the current station, and would come above ground on Washington Street, just where the Blue and Expo lines diverge.

This would solve the problem of excess game day crowding on the train lines by keeping the Blue Line separated from the Expo Line. This underground line would be about five blocks long.


Guest 19

Guest on November 08, 2010, at 08:36PM – #34

Guest 15: clearly, you haven't a clue regards adjacencies, programming, space planning, circulation or site design. Guest 16 didn't EVEN mention docks and truck access. Look at the amount of area taken up by service access for South Hall. If you put it underneath, you'll need a hell of a lot of service elevators (giant sized) and it will be much more of a hassle setting up and loading out for the crew and the place then gets a bad rep.

How will large exhibitors feel after their attendees inundate them with a cascade of complaints after trying to get to and navigate through the convention center after 72,000 fans have messed up their day?

This idea that a West Hall replacement with an equal amount of square footage can meld "seamlessly" with the I.M. Pei addition is sheer puff mongering. A significant portion of the addition would have to be demolished to make things seamless and the replacement facility would have to stretch along the north side of Pico, be relatively narrow in width to allow space for an event center and fire/safety requirements on the balance of the site. No two ways about it.

100,000 you say? My, what a nice round number. Let's allow 6,500 for a full house at Nokia and 17,500 for Staples; that leaves 76,000 having attended the car show in one day. Now imagine your 76,000 attendees for a car show, 72,000 for a sporting event, 6,500 for Nokia and you've got over 150,000 packed into the southwest corner of Downtown at one time. Cross our fingers that a 7.0 doesn't then occur.

Do you work for Leiweke or are you under the illusion that Anchutz walks on water? And do they get the land for free? It's damned valuable terrain which can bring in lots of income under a land lease. There'll be much campaign contributions if this thing goes forward. Did I say free? Oops...


User_32

J-M on November 08, 2010, at 08:40PM – #35

I'd feel much better if "guests" logged in under their names, because at least I'd know I wasn't responding to the same critic again and again.

I don't think a stadium should lift a neighborhood out of economic woes, but that's the theme of some of the pretty lame comments in this thread.

And I don't have any other bone to pick with AEG apart from the idea of building a football stadium Downtown (and the horrible metal Christmas tree at LA Live, and the whole Michael Jackson extravaganza). I think the NFL thing (which I mentioned back in the Entourage story on this blog) is opportunistic and piggy-backing on the efforts of a community that blossomed fine with just one major sports franchise. Another is overkill.


Guest 17

Guest on November 08, 2010, at 10:31PM – #36

No. 30: South Park doesn't look as bad as it did 5 years ago, but it's still mostly a joke. It's more Paducah than New York City, more Raytown than Chicago, more Barstow than Vancouver. The southern half of downtown still gives off the vibe of being starved for money. And with the current slump in RE investment, it's not going to change much over the next 5.

I wouldn't say a new stadium will necessarily cause the surrounding area to become nice. And you're right about the slum-bum condition of the area around the Coliseum. But my argument doesn't have to do with that. My issue is with the folks who think South Park is good enough just as it is. The ones who think it has reached a point where everyone can kick back, put their feet up on the table and take it all in. The ones who think small, aim low, and might just as well be living in San Bernardino or Reseda.


Guest 17

Guest on November 08, 2010, at 11:00PM – #37

No. 34: Do you have enough inside information and technical know-how to be as competent in assessing the layout of the convention center as the folks who presumably will be hired by AEG, or who are working for them right now? Maybe you do, maybe you don't. All I know is that the west hall of the center has a big setback on its north, south and west sides. Huge outdoor staircases and terraces that have rarely been used or ever needed. It's like the original architect had more land than he knew what to do with.

Considering all the large, sleek public buildings, including newer convention halls, built throughout the US over the past 20 years, the old west hall -- even without it being replaced by a combo stadium/events center -- looks like it would be better off flattened and totally replaced instead of tinkered with here and there. That seems more apparent because the annex to the west hall, added in the 1990s, has made the original building look even more unsophisticated and tired.


Brigham Yen on November 09, 2010, at 01:47AM – #38

From what I'm reading about this new flexible space stadium, I like it.

It sounds like AEG will be programming a lot of events in addition to bringing an NFL team back to Los Angeles. That translates into more pedestrian foot traffic that will benefit local restaurants and add much needed energy to a still relatively quiet urban city.

I love the ambition that AEG/Leiweke have and think 5 new hotels and towers are definitely a plus if it means adding density and taking over urban deadzones (i.e., surface parking lots).


User_32

George Bui () on November 09, 2010, at 09:09AM – #39

It LOOKS like it's possible...

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac185/boddingtonmeister/entouragestadium2.jpg

george


User_32

J-M on November 09, 2010, at 10:32AM – #40

From what I can tell, a lot of the folks who are rah-rah about a stadium Downtown don't actually live here. Some of the comments I see here and in yesterday's LA Times seem completely disconnected from a local resident's point of view. I understand Downtown's becoming a playground for bored West-siders and suburbanites, but a lot of people took a chance many years ago when there wasn't much going on here and actually made it their home. I think everyone deserves to have their opinion heard, including Downtown residents whose lives could be greatly impacted by this kind of decision. If you push out the residents, then you won't have a permanent base to support Downtown's revitalization and all of these shiny new venues and restaurants/bars will gradually fall into disuse once again. I can't imagine any of you wanting to live next door to a complex this big. I have no objection to a new stadium, just not this close to the center of town.


User_32

Raymond3000 on November 09, 2010, at 01:40PM – #41

My only question is where wuold a possible West Hall replacement be suitable or feasible? are they gonna somehow connect WH spanning 11th St. with the meeting space center behind the Ritz? or are they going to build the stadium on top where as the WH would be a podium taking up the old WH footprint and able to span 11th to connect with the building behind Ritz?


Guest 1

Guest on November 09, 2010, at 02:32PM – #42

J-M, I previously posted a comment to you, and I'm a DTLA resident of the Financial District who's lived here for four years. Just because you can't fathom why a resident of the neighborhood would actually consider that a stadium plus new convention space would benefit the area doesn't mean you can dismiss them as people who don't live there.


Guest 17

Guest on November 09, 2010, at 07:58PM – #43

No 40: I bet a lot more people are going to be chased out of downtown not by the expansion of the convention center or LA Live but by chronic problems with vagrants, ex-felons (in which downtown is sort of an entryway for those released from nearby jails), an ongoing lack of conveniences people elsewhere take for granted (Trader Joe's still thinks downtown spells trouble for their type of business?!), lousy schools, and other assorted urban pitfalls.

No 41: If a football field can be covered with a floor and surrounding seating areas somehow pushed back or pushed under, that would allow for the ground level of a stadium to double as an exhibition hall. Not sure how that can be accomplished, but such a room would have a super high ceiling.


Guest 20

Guest on November 09, 2010, at 08:09PM – #44

# 34: if you could see a plan-view drawing, the layout of the south hall with it's long arc of a loading dock leading to & interfacing directly with so much interior exhibition space - now THAT's what I call a seamless interface. Now, take an aerial view of the site that Lieweke wishes to work with. Position an event center with it's long axis parallel with 11th Street, between Staples Center and the freeway and as close to 11th as possible.

The leftover space must allow for fire/safety access and exhibition space equal to the amount existing at West Hall. You've got to cram it along the north side of Pico between the I.M. Pei convention concourse and the freeway. With that, how can you provide easy and efficient truck access and an efficient, seamless interface between a lengthy dock and the new exhibit space??? Only way I can imagine is if the dock were to face Pico and the truck access were to be elevated above and along that street.

There could be a high canopy between the new West Hall and the Event Center, but this could not be an enclosed space, due to the Fire Code. Fire trucks would need to be able to maneuver beneath such a canopy and its long axis couldn't center upon the pavilion now fronting West Hall. One gets the suspicion that either Pico or 11th (or both) would need to be bridged across.


User_32

Wanderer on November 11, 2010, at 02:36PM – #45

Research has repeatedly shown that sports stadiums don't generate revenue for a city. What they do is redistribute money that would have been spent elsewhere on other forms of entertainment. The Super Bowl games, to the extent that they generate out of region visitors who would not otherwise come to LA, are an exception, but small in the overall context.

Similarly, convention centers don't make money, they lose money. Cities are desperately competing with each other for conventions, so they charge rates that are below cost.

The only way any of this really helps Downtown is if spinoff businesses--hotels, restaurants, bars, stores--are created that do employ people and pay taxes. Would this happen with a new stadium? Maybe. Downtown is on a retail/restaurant upswing, though hotel occupancy rates are still pretty low, I believe. The optimistic view is that the South Park neighborhood has developed to the point where it's ripe for new businesses, but not to the point of maturity where they're all in place. The pessimistic view is that people will go to the football games, then get in their cars and drive away (slowly).

It's really important that any stadium be accompanied with a robust, mandatory plan for access by means other than cars. There was that kind of plan for AT&T Park in San Francisco. Start with having good walking and biking routes there, encouraging people to come to downtown before and after the game. A lot of transit service should be supported and marketed, including connections to key transit hubs like 7th St./Metrocenter Metrorail station and Union Station. The stadium/team should promote the hell out of the transit options that exist around there, but be prepared to pay for the massive peak loads that will be created.


Guest 21

Guest on November 11, 2010, at 04:11PM – #46

When the Rams played at the Coliseum, we'd often go and visit the Natural History Museum afterwards, rather than deal with the traffic congestion. After paying premiere prices for their seats in a new Event Center, many attendees will likely not be able to shell out for dining, seeing a movie or drinking or bowling next door.

But they may be in the mood for walking about and simply hanging in Downtown instead of sitting in traffic. The increased pedestrian traffic would have its effects, be it football, basketball or whatever. And a resultant increase in venues will draw conventioneers out of their hotel rooms to stroll about in the shades of evening.

As we know, government at all levels is way-strapped. Lieweke and company had ought to be willing to pony up for new/replacement facilities that would catch the direct attention of the entire nation, a must-see place which would provide an abundant payback for them, for South Park and for Downtown at large. The project has got to be done right, become a large civic inspiration. If not, people WILL NOT want to hang, will not want to see the place just for the sake of it. They'd best hire the right urbanist/urban designer/architect/structural engineer. If they're not willing to do this, the city council should tell him and his cohorts to take a hike.


Guest 22

Guest on November 11, 2010, at 11:46PM – #47

What, a living room (of sorts) for the entire city?


Guest 23

Guest on November 12, 2010, at 10:36AM – #48

Oh yeah: be sure that they include a one hundred foot high statue of Michael Jackson, right? And lots of kneeling pads scattered about....


Guest 5

Guest on November 12, 2010, at 10:59AM – #49

Hardly anyone cares here. I mean, when the Giants won last week, the whole SF (people from all walks of life) took to the streets to celebrate. The team rode around in cable cars!

Compare that to here, where mostly crazies show up after the Lakers win!


Guest 24

Guest on November 24, 2010, at 11:00PM – #50

FYI:$258m PLAN TARGETS GRIDLOCK / Interchange plans for alleviating traffic congestion along the 57/60 freeway interchnge include new connections on-ramp & off- ramp with new loops and overpass adjustment- to accommodate four lanes of traffic in each direction. SOUNDS LIKE THE SHOVELS' ARE READY!!!! THE CITY OF INDUSTRY IS NOT PLAYING DOWNTOWN.....WELCOME N.F.L...


Guest 25

Guest on December 02, 2010, at 10:33PM – #51

Sounds like they've roped Magic Johnson in on this project. See 'L.A. Observed.'


Guest 26

Guest on December 31, 2010, at 04:32PM – #52

I don't understand how the area is going to be "revitalized" without this complex? Do current residents (who only came there after Staples and LA Live made the area better) think that the area will simply get better because they moved there?

What do you think will improve the area? Another Starbucks or fast food joint?

Do you think the Convention Center can bring in more revenue in it's current state? We just lost a shot at an August convention that chose Huston over LA...in august? They would rather bake in Huston than come to our disjointed Convention Center...how bad is that?

I understand that everyone wants more prisons as long as they aren't near them...but this is a Sports complex and imprivement to the Convention Center in an area you moved into because of the changes made to the area BECAUSE of a Sports complex (Staples), if you want to live in a nice building in a bad area I'm sure we can find another spot in LA for you.

And the area around the baseball and football stadiums in Seattle have really been great for business and in cleaning up an area that was pretty scummy just like downtown LA used to be and still is in parts.


User_32

BobbyD on January 17, 2011, at 09:26AM – #53

A good movie to see the solution for the depth needed for the parking needed by this proposed development: "Journey To The Center Of The Earth". What football team has committed to playing in the new stadium- "Aliens"? Who is promising everybody their particular type of business to come with the stadium(maybe a hundred promised so far)- "Pyscho"?



Add Your Voice


In an effort to prevent spam, blogdowntown commenting requires that Javascript be enabled. Please check your browser settings and try again.

 


blogdowntown Photo Pool

Photos of Downtown contributed by readers like you.

Downtown Blogs


Downtown Sites


Elsewhere